Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23118727›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2012

Glycine receptor mutants of the mouse: what are possible routes of inhibitory compensation?

Natascha Schaefer, Nicolas Vogel, Carmen Villmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Startle Disease: New Molecular Insights into an Old Neurological Disorder.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2023
    Review
  2. Inhibitory Synaptic Influences on Developmental Motor Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Anxiety and Startle Phenotypes inFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  5. A novel nonsense autosomal dominant mutation in the GLRA1 gene causing hyperekplexia.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Impaired Glycine Receptor Trafficking in Neurological Diseases.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Natascha SchaeferEmil Fischer Center, Institute of Biochemistry, University Erlangen-Nuernberg Erlangen, Germany ; Institute for Clinical Neurobiology, University of Wuerzburg Wuerzburg, Germany.
Nicolas Vogel
Carmen Villmann
University of Würzburg · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Defects in glycinergic inhibition result in a complex neuromotor disorder in humans known as hyperekplexia (OMIM 149400) with similar phenotypes in rodents characterized by an exaggerated startle reflex and hypertonia. Analogous to genetic defects in humans single point mutations, microdeletions, or insertions in the Glra1 gene but also in the Glrb gene underlie the pathology in mice. The mutations either localized in the α (spasmodic, oscillator, cincinnati, Nmf11) or the β (spastic) subunit of the glycine receptor (GlyR) are much less tolerated in mice than in humans, leaving the question for the existence of different regulatory elements of the pathomechanisms in humans and rodents. In addition to the spontaneous mutations, new insights into understanding of the regulatory pathways in hyperekplexia or glycine encephalopathy arose from the constantly increasing number of knock-out as well as knock-in mutants of GlyRs. Over the last five years, various efforts using in vivo whole cell recordings provided a detailed analysis of the kinetic parameters underlying glycinergic dysfunction. Presynaptic compensation as well as postsynaptic compensatory mechanisms in these mice by other GlyR subunits or GABA(A) receptors, and the role of extra-synaptic GlyRs is still a matter of debate. A recent study on the mouse mutant oscillator displayed a novel aspect for compensation of functionality by complementation of receptor domains that fold independently. This review focuses on defects in glycinergic neurotransmission in mice discussed with the background of human hyperekplexia en route to strategies of compensation.

Indexed as

GlyRshyperekplexiaknockout micerescuespontaneous mouse mutantssynaptic inhibition

Identifiers

PMID23118727
PMCPMC3484359
OpenAlexW1988936493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.