Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23118489›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2013

Indirect read-out of the promoter DNA by RNA polymerase in the closed complex.

Subrata Debnath, Neeladri Sekhar Roy, Indrani Bera, Nanda Ghoshal, Siddhartha Roy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Subrata DebnathDivision of Structural Biology and Bioinformatics, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, 4 Raja Subodh Mullick Road, Kolkata 700032, India.
Neeladri Sekhar Roy
Indrani Bera
Nanda Ghoshal
Siddhartha Roy

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcription is initiated when RNA polymerase recognizes the duplex promoter DNA in the closed complex. Due to its transient nature, the closed complex has not been well characterized. How the initial promoter recognition occurs may offer important clues to regulation of transcription initiation. In this article, we have carried out single-base pair substitution experiments on two Escherichia coli promoters belonging to two different classes, the -35 and the extended -10, under conditions which stabilize the closed complex. Single-base pair substitution experiments indicate modest base-specific effects on the stability of the closed complex of both promoters. Mutations of base pairs in the -10 region affect the closed complexes of two promoters differently, suggesting different modes of interaction of the RNA polymerase and the promoter in the two closed complexes. Two residues on σ(70) which have been suggested to play important role in promoter recognition, Q437 and R436, were mutated and found to have different effects on the closed-complex stability. DNA circular dichroism (CD) and FRET suggest that the promoter DNA in the closed complex is distorted. Modeling suggests two different orientations of the recognition helix of the RNA polymerase in the closed complex. We propose that the RNA polymerase recognizes the sequence dependent conformation of the promoter DNA in the closed complex.

Indexed as

Promoter Regions, GeneticBase PairingDNA, BacterialDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesEscherichia coliModels, MolecularMutationProtein BindingSigma FactorDNA, BacterialDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesRNA polymerase sigma 70Sigma Factor

Identifiers

PMID23118489
PMCPMC3592454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.