Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23118409›Full record

ArticleBMJ quality & safety2012

Searching for the missing pieces between the hospital and primary care: mapping the patient process during care transitions.

Julie K Johnson, Jeanne M Farnan, Paul Barach, Gijs Hesselink, Hub Wollersheim, Loes Pijnenborg, Cor Kalkman, Vineet M Arora, HANDOVER Research Collaborative

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ quality & safety, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Process mapping in healthcare: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Analyzing and mitigating the risks of patient harm during operating room to intensive care unit patient handoffs.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Exploring barriers and opportunities to improve osteoporosis care across the acute-to-primary care interface: a qualitative study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Mapping the care transition from hospital to skilled nursing facility.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Julie K JohnsonFaculty of Medicine, Centre for Clinical Governance Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. j.johnson@unsw.edu.au
Jeanne M Farnan
Paul Barach
Gijs Hesselink
Hub Wollersheim
Loes Pijnenborg
Cor Kalkman
Vineet M Arora
HANDOVER Research Collaborative

Funding

A model for effective communications to improve inpatient ambulatory transitionsP20HS017119 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI JOHNSON, JULIE KAREN · 2007 to 2007
$192k
AHRQ HHS 1 P20 HS017119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSafe patient transitions depend on effective communication and a functioning care coordination process. Evidence suggests that primary care physicians are not satisfied with communication at transition points between inpatient and ambulatory care, and that communication often is not provided in a timely manner, omits essential information, or contains ambiguities that put patients at risk.

objectiveOur aim was to demonstrate how process mapping can illustrate current handover practices between ambulatory and inpatient care settings, identify existing barriers and facilitators to effective transitions of care, and highlight potential areas for quality improvement.

methodsWe conducted focus group interviews to facilitate a process mapping exercise with clinical teams in six academic health centres in the USA, Poland, Sweden, Italy, Spain and the Netherlands.

findingsAt a high level, the process of patient admission to the hospital through the emergency department, inpatient care, and discharge back in the community were comparable across sites. In addition, the process maps highlighted similar barriers to providing information to primary care physicians, inaccurate or incomplete information on referral and discharge, a lack of time and priority to collaborate with counterpart colleagues, and a lack of feedback to clinicians involved in the handovers.

conclusionsProcess mapping is effective in bringing together key stakeholders and makes explicit the mental models that frame their understanding of the clinical process. Exploring the barriers and facilitators to safe and reliable patient transitions highlights opportunities for further improvement work and illustrates ideas for best practices that might be transferrable to other settings.

Indexed as

CommunicationPrimary Health CareContinuity of Patient CareCooperative BehaviorEuropeFocus GroupsGeneral PractitionersHumansInstitutional Management TeamsInterprofessional RelationsInterviews as TopicMedical Staff, HospitalPatient AdmissionPatient DischargePatient HandoffProcess Assessment, Health Care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.