ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2013
Analysis of cardiopulmonary coupling to assess adaptive servo-ventilation success in complex sleep apnea management.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantification of ventilatory control in sleep apnea: from physiological insight to computable loop gain.Sleep · 2026Review
- Unraveling sleep apnea dynamics: quantifying loop gain using dynamical modeling of ventilatory control.Sleep · 2026Article
- Morphological Prediction of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure-associated Acute Respiratory Instability.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2025Article
- Cardiopulmonary Sleep Spectrograms Open a Novel Window Into Sleep Biology-Implications for Health and Disease.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Review
- Electrocardiogram-based sleep analysis for sleep apnea screening and diagnosis.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2020Article
- Phenotypes in obstructive sleep apnea: A definition, examples and evolution of approaches.Sleep medicine reviews · 2017Review
- Cardiopulmonary coupling analysis: changes before and after treatment with a mandibular advancement device.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2014Article
- An electrocardiogram-based analysis evaluating sleep quality in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) is used to treat complex sleep apnea syndrome (CompSAS), but with variable success. Factors influencing success are poorly understood. ASV devices determine their output based upon characteristics of a given breath and on proprietary algorithms that assume a periodic breathing pattern. Periodic breathing patterns produce elevated narrow band low-frequency cardiopulmonary coupling (eNB-LFC). Therefore, we hypothesized that ASV success would correlate with elevated proportions of periodic breathing as marked by eNB-LFC on cardiopulmonary coupling (CPC) analysis.
methodsThis was a retrospective study of 106 consecutive patients presenting to an academic tertiary care sleep center with CompSAS between July 2008 and July 2009 who underwent ASV titration with polysomnographic signals amenable to CPC analysis.
resultsThe study included 89 males (84 %) and 17 females (16 %), with mean age of 63.3 years. Median diagnostic apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was 38 (21, 56)/h, and on continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), the median residual AHI (CompSAS) was 36.5 (23, 58)/h, with central apneas occurring on average 22.5 (13, 39)/h. ASV brought AHI to 11.0 ± 13.0, with success in 81.1 % of patients, as defined by an AHI of <10/h. NB-LFC was elevated (>0) in 45.3 %; however, the percentage of eNB-LFC did not correlate with ASV treatment success (p = 0.518). No clinical factors were found to be associated with ASV success.
conclusionASV was successful in 81 % of patients with CompSAS. However, eNB-LFC calculated from CPC, a marker for periodic breathing, did not correlate with ASV success and therefore may not be a useful tool to predict ASV success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23117897What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.