Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23117816›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2013

Differences in views of schizophrenia during medical education: a comparative study of 1st versus 5th-6th year Italian medical students.

Lorenza Magliano, John Read, Alessandra Sagliocchi, Melania Patalano, Antonio D'Ambrosio, Nicoletta Oliviero

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lorenza MaglianoDepartment of Psychology, Second University of Naples, Viale Ellittico 31, 81100, Caserta, Italy, lorenza.magliano@unina2.it.
John Read
Alessandra Sagliocchi
Melania Patalano
Antonio D'Ambrosio
Nicoletta Oliviero

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study explored medical students' causal explanations and views of schizophrenia, and whether they changed during medical education.

methodThe survey was carried out on medical students of the Second University of Naples, Italy, who attended their first-year and their fifth- or sixth-year of lessons. The 381 who accepted were asked to read a case-vignette describing a person who met the ICD-10 criteria for schizophrenia and then fill in the Opinions on mental illness Questionnaire.

resultsThe most frequently cited causes were psychological traumas (60%) and stress (56%), followed by misuse of street drugs (47%), and heredity (42%). 28% of students stated that persons with the disorder could be well again, and 28% that they were unpredictable. Labeling the case as "schizophrenia" and naming heredity among the causes were associated with pessimism about recovery and higher perception of social distance. First-year students more frequently reported psychological traumas among the causes (76 vs. 45%), and less frequently heredity (35 vs. 81%) and stress (42 vs. 69%), and they perceived less social distance from the "schizophrenics" than fifth/sixth-year students. In particular, 18% percent of first-year versus 38% of fifth/sixth-year students believed that these persons were kept at a distance by the other, and 45 versus 57% felt frightened by persons with the condition.

conclusionsThese results indicate a need to include education on stigma and recovery in schizophrenia in the training of medical students.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleHumansItalyMalePsychiatrySchizophreniaStudents, MedicalSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.