Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23116780›Full record

ArticlePreventing chronic disease2012

Missed opportunities for providing low-fat dietary advice to people with diabetes.

Ingrid E Lobo, Danielle F Loeb, Vahram Ghushchyan, Irene E Schauer, Amy G Huebschmann

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventing chronic disease, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Depression treatment and health-related quality of life among adults with diabetes and depression.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2016
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ingrid E LoboUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, 1635 Aurora Ct, Mailstop F729, Aurora, CO 80045, USA. ingrid.lobo@ucdenver.edu
Danielle F Loeb
Vahram Ghushchyan
Irene E Schauer
Amy G Huebschmann
University of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteKL2TR001080 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2013 to 2017
$2.6M
Colorado Clinical and Translational Science Institute (KL2)KL2RR025779 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2008 to 2011
$2.2M
Colorado Clinical and Translational Science Institute (KL2)KL2TR000156 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2012 to 2013
$521k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000156NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001080NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR025779
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBecause cardiovascular disease is closely linked to diabetes, national guidelines recommend low-fat dietary advice for patients who have cardiovascular disease or are at risk for diabetes. The prevalence of receiving such advice is not known. We assessed the lifetime prevalence rates of receiving low-fat dietary advice from a health professional and the relationship between having diabetes or risk factors for diabetes and receiving low-fat dietary advice.

methodsFrom 2002 through 2009, 188,006 adults answered the following question in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey: "Has a doctor or other health professional ever advised you to eat fewer high-fat or high-cholesterol foods?" We assessed the association between receiving advice and the following predictors: a diabetes diagnosis, 7 single risk factors for type 2 diabetes, and total number of risk factors.

resultsAmong respondents without diabetes or risk factors for diabetes, 7.4% received low-fat dietary advice; 70.6% of respondents with diabetes received advice. Respondents with diabetes were almost twice as likely to receive advice as respondents without diabetes or its risk factors. As the number of risk factors increased, the likelihood of receiving low-fat dietary advice increased. Although unadjusted advice rates increased during the study period, the likelihood of receiving advice decreased.

conclusionAlthough most participants with diabetes received low-fat dietary advice, almost one-third did not. Low-fat dietary advice was more closely associated with the total number of diabetes risk factors than the presence of diabetes. Increasing rates of diabetes and diabetes risk factors are outpacing increases in provision of low-fat dietary advice.

Indexed as

Dietary FatsProfessional-Patient RelationsAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsCardiovascular DiseasesCounselingCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Dietary CarbohydratesFemaleGuideline AdherenceHealth Care SurveysHealth ExpendituresHumansDietary CarbohydratesDietary Fats

Identifiers

PMID23116780
PMCPMC3498946
OpenAlexW2093132754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.