Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23116430›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2013

Clopidogrel variability: role of plasma protein binding alterations.

Shobana Ganesan, Craig Williams, Cheryl L Maslen, Ganesh Cherala

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Ticagrelor Removal From Human Blood.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2017
    Article
  6. Anti-platelet Therapy Resistance - Concept, Mechanisms and Platelet Function Tests in Intensive Care Facilities.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2016
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shobana GanesanDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Oregon State University/Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Craig Williams
Cheryl L Maslen
Ganesh Cherala
Oregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Oregon Clinical and Translational Science InstituteKL2RR024141 · NCRR · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ORWOLL, ERIC S. · 2006 to 2011
$3.6M
Inflammatory cytokine-mediated induction of HIV cardiomyopathyK01RR024120 · NCRR · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI YEARLEY, JENNIFER · 2007 to 2008
$246k
NCRR NIH HHS 1 UL1 RR024120NCRR NIH HHS K01 RR024120NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR024141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe large inter-individual variability in clopidogrel response is attributed to pharmacokinetics. Although, it has been used since the late 1990s the pharmacokinetic fate of clopidogrel and its metabolites are poorly explained. The variable response to clopidogrel is believed to be multi-factorial, caused both by genetic and non-genetic factors. In this study, we examined whether the inactive metabolite can alter the plasma protein binding of the active metabolite, thus explaining the large inter-individual variability associated with clopidogrel response.

methodsFemale subjects (n = 28) with stable coronary disease who were not taking clopidogrel were recruited. Serial blood samples were collected following 300 mg oral dose of clopidogrel, plasma was isolated and quantified for total and free concentrations of active and inactive metabolites. Inhibition of platelet aggregation was measured using the phosphorylated vasodilator stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) assay.

resultsA significant correlation was observed between VASP and both free (r = 0.49, P < 0.05) and total (r = 0.49, P < 0.05) concentrations of the active metabolite. Surprisingly, we observed a significant correlation with both free (r = 0.42, P < 0.05) and total (r = 0.67, P < 0.001) concentrations of the inactive metabolite as well. Free fractions of the active metabolite rose with increasing protein binding of the inactive metabolite (P < 0.05).

conclusionsThe above in vivo data suggest that the inactive metabolite displaces the active metabolite from binding sites. Thus, the inactive metabolite might increase the free concentration of the active metabolite leading to enhanced inhibition of platelet aggregation. The plasma protein binding mechanism would offer an additional therapeutic strategy to optimize clopidogrel pharmacotherapy.

Indexed as

AgedAryl Hydrocarbon HydroxylasesBlood ProteinsCell Adhesion MoleculesChromatography, LiquidClopidogrelCoronary DiseaseCytochrome P-450 CYP2C19FemaleGenotyping TechniquesHumansMass SpectrometryMicrofilament ProteinsMiddle AgedPhosphoproteinsPlatelet AggregationAryl Hydrocarbon HydroxylasesBlood ProteinsCell Adhesion MoleculesClopidogrelCYP2C19 protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP2C19Microfilament ProteinsPhosphoproteinsPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsTiclopidineVasodilator-Stimulated Phosphoprotein

Identifiers

PMID23116430
PMCPMC3690105
OpenAlexW1536088879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.