Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2013
Early stage development of the glycine-1 re-uptake inhibitor SCH 900435: central nervous system effects compared with placebo in healthy men.
Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of the novel GlyT1 inhibitor BI 425809 in Alzheimer's dementia: a randomized controlled trial.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2023Trial
- Multiple Rising Doses of Oral BI 425809, a GlyT1 Inhibitor, in Young and Elderly Healthy Volunteers: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Phase I Study Investigating Safety and Pharmacokinetics.Clinical drug investigation · 2018Trial
- Medications for alcohol use disorders: An overview.Pharmacology & therapeutics · 2018Review
- Further characterization of the GlyT-1 inhibitor Org25935: anti-alcohol, neurobehavioral, and gene expression effects.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo report the first three studies with SCH 900435, a selective glycine-1 re-uptake inhibitor in development for treating schizophrenia, using systematic evaluations of pharmacodynamics to understand the observed effects.
methodsThree double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (single, visual effect and multiple dose) were performed. In the single and multiple dose study SCH 900435 (0.5-30 mg) was given to healthy males and frequent pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic measurements were performed. The visual effects study incorporated visual electrophysiological measures of macular, retinal and intracranial visual pathway function.
resultsIn the single dose study (highest difference, 95% CI, P) increases in smooth pursuit eye movements (8, 12 mg (-6.09, 10.14, -2.04, 0.013), 30 mg), pupil : iris ratio (20 and 30 mg (-0.065, 0.09, -0.04, <0.0001)), VAS colour perception (30 mg (-9.48, 13.05, -5.91, <0.0001)) and changes in spontaneous reports of visual disturbance were found, while FSH (8 mg (0.42, 0.18, 0.66, 0.0015), 12, 20 mg), LH (8-30 mg (1.35, 0.65, 2.05, 0.0003)) and EEG alpha2 activity decreased (12, 20, 30 mg (0.27, 0.14, 0.41, 0.0002)). A subsequent dedicated visual effects study demonstrated that visual effects were transient without underlying electrophysiological changes. This provided enough safety information for starting a multiple ascending dose study, showing less visual symptoms after twice daily dosing and titration, possibly due to tolerance.
conclusionsSeveral central nervous system (CNS) effects and gonadotropic changes resulted from administration of 8 mg and higher, providing evidence for CNS penetration and pharmacological activity of SCH 900435. Antipsychotic activity in patients, specificity of the reported effects for this drug class and possible tolerance to visual symptoms remain to be established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.