Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23115650›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

A cost effectiveness and capacity analysis for the introduction of universal rotavirus vaccination in Kenya: comparison between Rotarix and RotaTeq vaccines.

Albert Jan van Hoek, Mwanajuma Ngama, Amina Ismail, Jane Chuma, Samuel Cheburet, David Mutonga, Tatu Kamau, D James Nokes

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Systematic review of the economic value of diarrheal vaccines.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2014
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Diverse processes in rotavirus vaccine development.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A guide to oral vaccination: Highlighting electrospraying as a promising manufacturing technique toward a successful oral vaccine development.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Cohort Profile: The Kilifi Vaccine Monitoring Study.International journal of epidemiology · 2017
    Article
  18. Current state and challenges in developing oral vaccines.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Albert Jan van HoekImmunisation, Hepatitis and Blood Safety Department, Health Protection Agency, London, United Kingdom.
Mwanajuma Ngama
Amina Ismail
Jane Chuma
Samuel Cheburet
David Mutonga
Tatu Kamau
D James Nokes
Ministry of Health · KEKenya Medical Research Institute · KEUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 084633Wellcome Trust 092654
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiarrhoea is an important cause of death in the developing world, and rotavirus is the single most important cause of diarrhoea associated mortality. Two vaccines (Rotarix and RotaTeq) are available to prevent rotavirus disease. This analysis was undertaken to aid the decision in Kenya as to which vaccine to choose when introducing rotavirus vaccination.

methodsCost-effectiveness modelling, using national and sentinel surveillance data, and an impact assessment on the cold chain.

resultsThe median estimated incidence of rotavirus disease in Kenya was 3015 outpatient visits, 279 hospitalisations and 65 deaths per 100,000 children under five years of age per year. Cumulated over the first five years of life vaccination was predicted to prevent 34% of the outpatient visits, 31% of the hospitalizations and 42% of the deaths. The estimated prevented costs accumulated over five years totalled US$1,782,761 (direct and indirect costs) with an associated 48,585 DALYs. From a societal perspective Rotarix had a cost-effectiveness ratio of US$142 per DALY (US$5 for the full course of two doses) and RotaTeq US$288 per DALY ($10.5 for the full course of three doses). RotaTeq will have a bigger impact on the cold chain compared to Rotarix.

conclusionVaccination against rotavirus disease is cost-effective for Kenya irrespective of the vaccine. Of the two vaccines Rotarix was the preferred choice due to a better cost-effectiveness ratio, the presence of a vaccine vial monitor, the requirement of fewer doses and less storage space, and proven thermo-stability.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisChild, PreschoolCost of IllnessHumansKenyaRotavirusRotavirus InfectionsViral VaccinesViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID23115650
PMCPMC3480384
OpenAlexW1998506676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.