Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23115468›Full record

ArticleP & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management2012

The nanomedicine revolution: part 2: current and future clinical applications.

C Lee Ventola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Alzheimer's disease: unraveling role of xanthone derivatives and nanocarriers.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. LongitudinalFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  17. Demographic perspectives on the rise of longevity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Impact of Molybdenum Compounds as Anticancer Agents.Bioinorganic chemistry and applications · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

C Lee Ventola

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although many nanotherapeutic and nanodiagnostic agents are in use and have the potential to improve health care, many barriers have impeded the development and availability of these products. Despite these impediments, it is expected that nanomaterials will become an integral part of mainstream medicine.

Identifiers

PMID23115468
PMCPMC3474440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.