Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23115182›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2012

Irrational choice under uncertainty correlates with lower striatal D(2/3) receptor binding in rats.

Paul J Cocker, Katherine Dinelle, Rick Kornelson, Vesna Sossi, Catharine A Winstanley

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A neurobiological pathway to smoking in adolescence: TTC12-ANKK1-DRD2 variants and reward response.European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Similarities and Differences in Diagnostic Criteria.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Understanding Addiction Using Animal Models.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Gambling disorder: an integrative review of animal and human studies.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2017
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paul J CockerDepartment of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Katherine Dinelle
Rick Kornelson
Vesna Sossi
Catharine A Winstanley
University of British Columbia · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individual differences in dopamine (DA) signaling, including low striatal D(2/3) receptors, may increase vulnerability to substance abuse, although whether this phenotype confers susceptibility to nonchemical addictions is unclear. The degree to which people use "irrational" cognitive heuristics when choosing under uncertainty can determine whether they find gambling addictive. Given that dopaminergic projections to the striatum signal reward expectancy and modulate decision-making, individual differences in DA signaling could influence the extent of such biases. To test this hypothesis, we used a novel task to model biased, risk-averse decision-making in rats. Animals chose between a "safe" lever, which guaranteed delivery of the wager, or an "uncertain" lever, which delivered either double the wager or nothing with 50:50 odds. The bet size varied from one to three sugar pellets. Although the amount at stake did not alter the options' utility, a subgroup of "wager-sensitive" rats increased their preference for the safe lever as the bet size increased, akin to risk aversion. In contrast, wager-insensitive rats slightly preferred the uncertain option consistently. Amphetamine increased choice of the uncertain option in wager-sensitive, but not in wager-insensitive rats, whereas a D(2/3) receptor antagonist decreased uncertain lever choice in wager-insensitive rats alone. Micro-PET and autoradiography using [(11)C]raclopride confirmed a strong correlation between high wager sensitivity and low striatal D(2/3) receptor density. These data suggest that the propensity for biased decision-making under uncertainty is influenced by striatal D(2/3) receptor expression, and provide novel support for the hypothesis that susceptibility to chemical and behavioral addictions may share a common neurobiological basis.

Indexed as

UncertaintyAmphetamineAnimalsAutoradiographyBenzazepinesChoice BehaviorConditioning, OperantDopamine AntagonistsDopamine Uptake InhibitorsGamblingIndividualityMaleNeostriatumPositron-Emission TomographyRatsRats, Long-EvansAmphetamineBenzazepinesDopamine AntagonistsDopamine Uptake InhibitorseticloprideReceptors, Dopamine D2Receptors, Dopamine D4SalicylamidesSCH 23390

Identifiers

PMID23115182
PMCPMC6621583
OpenAlexW2143800637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.