Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23114927›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2013

Use of multiplex real-time PCR for detection of common diarrhea causing protozoan parasites in Egypt.

John T Nazeer, Khalifa El Sayed Khalifa, Heidrun von Thien, Mahmoud Mohamed El-Sibaei, Magda Youssef Abdel-Hamid, Ranya Ayman Samir Tawfik, Egbert Tannich

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Parasitic fauna of bats from Costa Rica.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Infection & chemotherapy · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Update on laboratory diagnosis of amoebiasis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

John T NazeerDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Abbassia, 11566 Cairo, Egypt.
Khalifa El Sayed Khalifa
Heidrun von Thien
Mahmoud Mohamed El-Sibaei
Magda Youssef Abdel-Hamid
Ranya Ayman Samir Tawfik
Egbert Tannich
Ain Shams University · EGBernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diarrhea is an important cause of morbidity and mortality, worldwide. Giardia intestinalis, Cryptosporidium spp., and Entamoeba histolytica are the most common diarrhea-causing parasitic protozoa. Diagnosis of these parasites is usually performed by microscopy. However, microscopy lacks sensitivity and specificity. Replacing microscopy with more sensitive and specific nucleic acid based methods is hampered by the higher costs, in particular in developing countries. Multiplexing the detection of more than one parasite in a single test by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has been found to be very effective and would decrease the cost of the test. In the present study, stool samples collected from 396 Egyptian patients complaining of diarrhea along with 202 faecal samples from healthy controls were examined microscopically by direct smear method and after concentration using formol-ethyl acetate. Frozen portions of the same samples were tested by multiplex real-time for simultaneous detection of E. histolytica, G. intestinalis, and Cryptosporidium spp. The results indicate that among diarrheal patients in Egypt G. intestinalis is the most common protozoan parasite, with prevalence rates of 30.5 and 37.1 %, depending on the method used (microscopy vs. multiplex real-time PCR). Cryptosporidium spp. was detected in 1 % of the diarrheal patients by microscopy and in 3 % by real-time PCR. While E. histolytica/dispar was detected in 10.8 % by microscopy, less than one fifth of them (2 %) were found true positive for Entamoeba dispar by real-time PCR. E. histolytica DNA was not detected in any of the diarrheal patients. In comparison with multiplex real-time PCR, microscopy exhibited many false positive and negative cases with the three parasites giving sensitivities and specificities of 100 and 91 % for E. histolytica/dispar, 57.8 and 85.5 % for G. intestinalis, and 33.3 and 100 % for Cryptosporidium spp.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolCryptosporidiumDiarrheaEgyptEntamoeba histolyticaFecesGiardia lambliaHumansInfantMiddle AgedMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMultiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction

Identifiers

PMID23114927
OpenAlexW2020872973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.