Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23114845›Full record

ReviewCancer metastasis reviews2013

Heading off with the herd: how cancer cells might maneuver supernumerary centrosomes for directional migration.

Angela Ogden, Padmashree C G Rida, Ritu Aneja

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer metastasis reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A Quantitative Centrosomal Amplification Score Predicts Local Recurrence of Ductal CarcinomaClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Near-tetraploid cancer cells show chromosome instability triggered by replication stress and exhibit enhanced invasiveness.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Angela OgdenDepartment of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.
Padmashree C G Rida
Ritu Aneja
Georgia State University · US

Funding

Evaluation of HSET as a Novel Theranostic Target for Breast Cancer TherapyR01CA169127 · NCI · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ANEJA, RITU · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
Evaluation of antiangiogenic role of EM011, a novel tubulin-binding agentR00CA131489 · NCI · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ANEJA, RITU · 2010 to 2012
$732k
NCI NIH HHS R00 CA131489NCI NIH HHS R01 CA169127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The complicity of centrosomes in carcinogenesis is unmistakable. Mounting evidence clearly implicates a robust correlation between centrosome amplification (CA) and malignant transformation in diverse tissue types. Furthermore, CA has been suggested as a marker of cancer aggressiveness, in particular the invasive phenotype, in breast and prostate cancers. One means by which CA promotes malignancy is through induction of transient spindle multipolarity during mitosis, which predisposes the cell to karyotypic changes arising from low-grade chromosome mis-segregation. It is well recognized that during cell migration in interphase, centrosome-mediated nucleation of a radial microtubule array is crucial for establishing a polarized Golgi apparatus, without which directionality is precluded. The question of how cancer cells maneuver their supernumerary centrosomes to achieve directionality during cell migration is virtually uncharted territory. Given that CA is a hallmark of cancers and has been correlated with cancer aggressiveness, malignant cells are presumably competent in managing their centrosome surfeit during directional migration, although the cellular logistics of this process remain unexplored. Another key angle worth pondering is whether an overabundance of centrosomes confers some advantage on cancer cells in terms of their migratory and invasive capabilities. Recent studies have uncovered a remarkable strategy that cancer cells employ to deal with the problem of excess centrosomes and ensure bipolar mitoses, viz., centrosome clustering. This review aims to change the narrative by exploring how an increased centrosome complement may, via aneuploidy-independent modulation of the microtubule cytoskeleton, enhance directional migration and invasion of malignant cells. We postulate that CA imbues cancer cells with cytoskeletal advantages that enhance cell polarization, Golgi-dependent vesicular trafficking, stromal invasion, and other aspects of metastatic progression. We also propose that centrosome declustering may represent a novel, cancer cell-specific antimetastatic strategy, as cancer cells may rely on centrosome clustering during migration as they do in mitosis. Elucidation of these details offers an exciting avenue for future research, as does investigating how CA may promote metastasis through enhanced directional migration.

Indexed as

Cell MovementAntineoplastic AgentsCell PolarityCell Transformation, NeoplasticCentrosomeGolgi ApparatusHumansMitosisNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasmsAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID23114845
PMCPMC3581755
OpenAlexW2019441624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.