ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2013
Pharmacodynamics of anidulafungin against clinical Aspergillus fumigatus isolates in a nonneutropenic murine model of disseminated aspergillosis.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computational prediction and conformation of relationships among microbes, drugs and diseases.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Assessment of Antifungal Pharmacodynamics.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Comparative Pharmacodynamics of Echinocandins against Aspergillus fumigatus Using anAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2021Article
- A New Marker of Echinocandin Activity in anAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2018Article
- Effects of Echinocandins in Combination with Nikkomycin Z against Invasive Candida albicans Bloodstream Isolates and theAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2017Article
- Pharmacodynamics of Voriconazole against Wild-Type and Azole-Resistant Aspergillus flavus Isolates in a Nonneutropenic Murine Model of Disseminated Aspergillosis.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2017Article
- Triazole Resistance in Aspergillus spp.: A Worldwide Problem?Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016Review
- Pharmacodynamics of isavuconazole in an Aspergillus fumigatus mouse infection model.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2015Article
- Posaconazole prophylaxis in experimental azole-resistant invasive pulmonary aspergillosis.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2015Article
- Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of voriconazole and anidulafungin in adult patients with invasive aspergillosis.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2014Article
- Assessment of efficacy of antifungals against Aspergillus fumigatus: value of real-time bioluminescence imaging.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2013Article
- Pharmacodynamics and dose-response relationships of liposomal amphotericin B against different azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus isolates in a murine model of disseminated aspergillosis.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Azole resistance is an emerging increasing problem in Aspergillus fumigatus that results in treatment failure. Alternative treatments may improve the therapeutic outcome in patients with azole-resistant invasive aspergillosis (IA). Little is known about the in vivo efficacy of the echinocandin anidulafungin (AFG) in IA. The in vivo efficacy of 2.5, 5, 10, and 20 mg/kg of body weight AFG was assessed against two clinical Aspergillus fumigatus isolates with identical AFG minimum effective concentrations (MECs; 0.03 mg/liter) in a murine model of IA: a wild-type voriconazole (VCZ)-susceptible (VCZ(s)) A. fumigatus isolate (AZN 8196) and a VCZ-resistant (VCZ(r)) A. fumigatus isolate (V52-35) harboring the TR(34)/L98H resistance mechanism (substitution at codon L98 in combination with a 34-bp tandem repeat in the promoter region of the CYP51A gene). The pharmacokinetics of AFG were also assessed for each dose. Increasing doses increased survival for both isolates in a manner dependent on the AFG dose level (R(2) = 0.99 and 0.95, respectively) up to a maximum of 72.7% and 45.45% for the VCZ(s) and VCZ(r) isolates, respectively. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) correlated significantly with the dose in a linear fashion over the entire dosing range (R(2) = 0.86). The Hill equation with a variable slope fitted the relationship between the 24-h AUC/MEC ratio and 14-day survival well (R(2) = 0.87; P < 0.05). The 50% effective AUC/MEC for total AFG was 126.5 (95% confidence interval, 79.09 to 202.03). AFG treatment improved the survival of mice in a dose-dependent manner; however, a maximal response was not achieved with either isolate even in those treated with the highest AFG dose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.