Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23114512›Full record

Trial reportAIDS and behavior2013

Acceptability of potential rectal microbicide delivery systems for HIV prevention: a randomized crossover trial.

Heather A Pines, Pamina M Gorbach, Robert E Weiss, Kristen Hess, Ryan Murphy, Terry Saunders, Joelle Brown, Peter A Anton, Ross D Cranston

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in AIDS and behavior, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Acceptability of PC-1005 Gel Administered Rectally to HIV-1 Seronegative Adults at Three Different Volume Levels (MTN-037).AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Transcutaneously refillable nanofluidic implant achieves sustained level of tenofovir diphosphate for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. On-demand microbicide products: design matters.Drug delivery and translational research · 2017
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Heather A PinesDepartment of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California-Los Angeles, 650 Charles E. Young Dr., South CHS 41-295A, P.O. Box 951772, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1772, USA. hpines@ucla.edu
Pamina M Gorbach
Robert E Weiss
Kristen Hess
Ryan Murphy
Terry Saunders
Joelle Brown
Peter A Anton
Ross D Cranston
University of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

UCLA Rapid, Relevant, Rigorous Implementation Science HubP30MH058107 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Nina Thawata Harawa · 1997 to 2026
$53.5M
Virology CoreP30AI028697 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI KITCHEN, SCOTT G · 1991 to 2018
$39.9M
Regulatory compliance and human subjects safetyU19AI060614 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI HENDRIX, CRAIG WALTER · 2004 to 2009
$19.1M
NIAID NIH HHS AI28697NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI028697NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI060614NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI0606414NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH058107NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH58107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We assessed the acceptability of three of over-the-counter products representative of potential rectal microbicide (RM) delivery systems. From 2009 to 2010, 117 HIV-uninfected males (79 %) and females (21 %) who engage in receptive anal intercourse participated in a 6-week randomized crossover acceptability trial. Participants received each of three products (enema, lubricant-filled applicator, suppository) every 2 weeks in a randomized sequence. CASI and T-ACASI scales assessed product acceptability via Likert responses. Factor analysis was used to identify underlying factors measured by each scale. Random effects models were fit to examine age and gender effects on product acceptability. Three underlying factors were identified: Satisfaction with Product Use, Sexual Pleasure, and Ease of Product Use. For acceptability, the applicator ranked highest; however, differences between product acceptability scores were greatest among females and younger participants. These findings indicate that RM delivery systems impact their acceptability and should be considered early in RM development to enhance potential use.

Indexed as

Administration, RectalAdultAnti-Infective Agents, LocalCross-Over StudiesDrug Delivery SystemsEnemaFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansLubricantsMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareRectumSexual BehaviorSuppositoriesAnti-Infective Agents, LocalLubricantsSuppositories

Identifiers

PMID23114512
PMCPMC3594349
OpenAlexW2039665500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.