Observational studyInternational journal of colorectal disease2013
Robotic right colectomy for cancer with intracorporeal anastomosis: short-term outcomes from a single institution.
Observational study in International journal of colorectal disease, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robotic versus laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a systematic review of the evidence.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Ileo-colic intra-corporeal anastomosis during robotic right colectomy: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of different techniques.International journal of colorectal disease · 2021Pooled it
- Systematic review of operative outcomes of robotic surgical procedures performed with endoscopic linear staplers or robotic staplers.Journal of robotic surgery · 2019Pooled it
- Robotic versus Laparoscopic Approach in Colonic Resections for Cancer and Benign Diseases: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.PloS one · 2015Pooled it
- Outcomes of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic and open surgery: a systematic review.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2014Pooled it
- Long-term oncologic after robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: a prospective randomized study.Surgical endoscopy · 2019Trial
- Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Laparoscopic vs. Robotic Approaches-A Review of the Literature.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- How aging may impact the failure to rescue after colorectal laparoscopic surgery. Analysis of 1000 patients in a single high-volume center.Updates in surgery · 2025Article
- Implementation of totally robotic right hemicolectomy: lessons learned from a prospective cohort.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Article
- A Systematic Review of Varying Definitions and the Clinical Significance of Fredet's Fascia in the Era of Complete Mesocolic Excision.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- A propensity score matching study of totally robotic right hemicolectomy versus robot-assisted right hemicolectomy.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Article
- Robotic-assisted Surgery: Expanding Indication to Colon Cancer in Japan.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2022Review
- The Italian Consensus on minimally invasive simultaneous resections for synchronous liver metastasis and primary colorectal cancer: A Delphi methodology.Updates in surgery · 2021Article
- Updates on Robotic CME for Right Colon Cancer: A Qualitative Systematic Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Review
- What is the best surgical procedure of transverse colon cancer? An evidence map and minireview.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021Review
- Fashioning enterotomy closure after totally laparoscopic ileocolic anastomosis for right colon cancer: a multicenter experience.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Article
- Robotic surgery for colorectal disease: review of current port placement and future perspectives.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2020Article
- Robotic colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis is feasible with no operative conversions during the learning curve for an experienced laparoscopic surgeon developing a robotics program.Journal of robotic surgery · 2019Article
- Short- and long-term outcomes of totally robotic versus robotic-assisted right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: A retrospective study.Medicine · 2019Article
- Totally robotic complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer.Journal of robotic surgery · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLaparoscopic surgery for colon cancer has widely accepted as safe and effective. However, few studies report outcomes on robotic right colon resection with confectioning of the intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and safety of robotic right colon resection with intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis (RRCIA) in patients with cancer.
methodsData of consecutive series of 20 patients undergoing RRCIA between June 2011 and May 2012 at our institution were prospectively collected in order to evaluate surgical and oncological short-term outcomes.
resultsSeven males and 13 females were operated of RRCIA during the study period. Mean age is 66.7 years. The mean overall operative time was 327.5 min (255-485), and the robot time was 286 min (range 225-440 min). No conversion to open or laparoscopy occurred. The mean specimen length was 32.7 cm (range 26-44 cm), and the mean number of harvested lymph nodes was 17.6 (range 14-21). During the 30 postoperative days, only one complication occurred, consisting in an infection of surgical specimen extraction wound.
conclusionThe RRCIA is a feasible and safe for patients with right colon cancer, also in terms of intraoperative oncological outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.