Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23114475›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of colorectal disease2013

Infliximab versus cyclosporine as rescue therapy in acute severe steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kah Hoong Chang, John P Burke, J Calvin Coffey

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of colorectal disease, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Acute severe ulcerative colitis: using JAK-STAT inhibitors for improved clinical outcomes.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Cyclosporine Therapy as a Rescue Treatment in Steroid Refractory Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Real Life Data From a Tertiary Center.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kah Hoong ChangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Limerick University Hospital, Dooradoyle, Limerick, Ireland.
John P Burke
J Calvin Coffey
University Hospital Limerick · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAcute severe colitis affects 25 % of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Up to 30-40 % of these patients are resistant to intensive steroid therapy and therefore require rescue therapy to prevent emergent colectomy. Data comparing rescue therapy using infliximab and cyclosporine are limited and equivocal. This study evaluates the outcomes of UC patients receiving infliximab or cyclosporine as rescue therapy in acute severe steroid-refractory exacerbations.

methodsElectronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane database) were searched for studies directly comparing infliximab and cyclosporine in UC, and references of included studies were screened. Two independent reviewers identified relevant studies and extracted data. Meta-analyses were performed using the random effect model. Outcome measures included 3- and 12-month colectomy rates, adverse drug reactions, and postoperative complications.

resultsSix retrospective cohort studies describing 321 patients met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis did not show significant differences between infliximab and cyclosporine in the 3-month colectomy rate (odds ratio (OR) = 0.86, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 0.31-2.41, p = 0.775), in the 12-month colectomy rate (OR = 0.60, 95 % CI = 0.19-1.89, p = 0.381), in adverse drug reactions (OR = 0.76, 95 % CI = 0.34-1.70, p = 0.508), and in postoperative complications (OR = 1.66, 95 % CI = 0.26-10.50, p = 0.591). Funnel plot revealed no publication bias.

conclusionsInfliximab and cyclosporine are comparable when used as rescue therapy in acute severe steroid-refractory UC. Randomized trials are required to further evaluate these agents.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAntibodies, MonoclonalColectomyColitis, UlcerativeCyclosporineHumansInfliximabPostoperative ComplicationsPublication BiasSteroidsAntibodies, MonoclonalCyclosporineInfliximabSteroids

Identifiers

PMID23114475
OpenAlexW2096256540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.