Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23113860›Full record

ArticleInternational surgery

Prognosis of patients with gastric cancer who underwent proximal gastrectomy.

Masahide Ikeguchi, Abdul Kader, Seigo Takaya, Youji Fukumoto, Tomohiro Osaki, Hiroaki Saito, Shigeru Tatebe, Toshiro Wakatsuki

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Multicenter prospective trial of total gastrectomy versus proximal gastrectomy for upper third cT1 gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2021
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Surgery Matters: Progress in Surgical Management of Gastric Cancer.Current treatment options in oncology · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Can Proximal Gastrectomy with Double-Tract Reconstruction Replace Total Gastrectomy? A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Proximal gastrectomy with exclusion of no. 3b lesser curvature lymph node dissection could be indicated for patients with advanced upper-third gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Proximal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.Journal of gastric cancer · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Masahide IkeguchiDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan. masaike@med.tottori-u.ac.jp
Abdul Kader
Seigo Takaya
Youji Fukumoto
Tomohiro Osaki
Hiroaki Saito
Shigeru Tatebe
Toshiro Wakatsuki
Tottori University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proximal gastrectomy (PG) has been introduced for patients who are preoperatively diagnosed with early gastric cancer located in the upper third of the stomach. In the present study, we compared the prognosis of patients who underwent PG with that of patients who underwent total gastrectomy (TG). Between 1997 and 2006, 51 patients were diagnosed with early gastric cancer located in the upper third of the stomach and underwent PG. In the same period, 35 patients were diagnosed with early gastric cancer and underwent TG. Of these, in 24 patients, the cancer was localized in the middle to upper part of the stomach, and 11 patients had multiple cancers. We compared the clinicopathologic differences and prognoses between the two groups. Significantly fewer lymph nodes were dissected in the PG group (mean, 18.2) than in the TG group (mean, 36.6;P < 0.001). Complications were detected in 17.6% of patients in the PG group and in 14.3% of patients in the TG group, which was not significant (P = 0.678). The overall and disease-specific 5-year survival rates in the 51 patients who underwent PG (88.7% and 97.1%, respectively) were not different from those in the 35 patients who underwent TG (87.6% and 93.4%; P = 0.971 and P = 0.553; respectively). These findings indicate that PG can be performed safely and may have various advantages compared with TG in terms of patients' daily lives.

Indexed as

Disease-Free SurvivalGastrectomyHumansPrognosisStomach Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID23113860
PMCPMC3723220
OpenAlexW2046095747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.