Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23113662›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2012

Reasons for not reporting patient safety incidents in general practice: a qualitative study.

Marius Brostrøm Kousgaard, Anne Sofie Joensen, Thorkil Thorsen

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Using Incident Reporting Systems to Improve Patient Safety and Quality of Care.Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marius Brostrøm KousgaardThe Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. marbro@sund.ku.dk
Anne Sofie Joensen
Thorkil Thorsen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the reasons for not reporting patient safety incidents in general practice.

designQualitative interviews with general practitioners and members of the project group.

settingGeneral practice clinics in the Region of Northern Jutland in Denmark. SUBJECTS: Twelve general practitioners.

main outcome measuresThe experiences and reflections of the involved professionals with regard to system use and non-use.

resultsWhile most respondents were initially positive towards the idea of reporting and learning from patient safety incidents, they actually reported very few incidents. The major reasons for the low reporting rates are found to be a perceived lack of practical usefulness, issues of time and effort in a busy clinic with competing priorities, and considerations of appropriateness in relation to other professionals.

conclusionThe results suggest that the visions of formal, comprehensive, and systematic reporting of (and learning from) patient safety incidents will be quite difficult to realize in general practice. Future studies should investigate how various ways of organizing incident reporting at the regional level influence local activities of reporting and learning in general practice.

Indexed as

DenmarkGeneral PracticeHumansMedical ErrorsPatient SafetyQualitative ResearchRisk ManagementTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID23113662
PMCPMC3520413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.