Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23112883›Full record

ArticleGastrointestinal cancer research : GCR2012

A phase 2 trial of ixabepilone plus cetuximab in first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Caio M Rocha Lima, Edward H Lin, George P Kim, Jeffrey K Giguere, John Marshall, Mark Zalupski, Chris Papageorgio, Miklos L Auber, Remigiusz Kaleta, M Brent McHenry and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastrointestinal cancer research : GCR, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Epothilones as Natural Compounds for Novel Anticancer Drugs Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  3. Silencing A7-nAChR levels increases the sensitivity of gastric cancer cells to ixabepilone treatment.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Caio M Rocha LimaUniversity of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center Miami, FL.
Edward H Lin
George P Kim
Jeffrey K Giguere
John Marshall
Mark Zalupski
Chris Papageorgio
Miklos L Auber
Remigiusz Kaleta
M Brent McHenry
Ovidiu C Trifan
Philip A Philip
Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this phase 2 study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ixabepilone plus cetuximab in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

methodsEligible patients had advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma that was metastatic or not amenable to resection, a Karnofsky performance status ≥70%, and no prior therapy for advanced disease. Patients received ixabepilone 32 mg/m(2) (3-hour IV infusion) every 3 weeks and cetuximab 250 mg/m(2) (1-hour IV infusion) weekly. The primary efficacy end point was the 6-month survival rate. Secondary end points included tumor response rate, overall survival, progression-free survival, and tolerability.

resultsA total of 54 patients were enrolled on this study. The 6-month survival rate was 57% (31/54: 95% CI: 43-71%) with a median overall survival of 7.6 months (95% CI: 5.5-12.2 months). Patients who developed acneiform rash (n = 36) had a median survival of 8.8 months, compared with 2.6 months for those without rash (n = 18). Of 31 patients with measurable disease (defined as response-evaluable), 4 had confirmed partial responses and an additional 24 had stable disease. The combination was generally well-tolerated with the most common grade 3/4 hematological toxicities being leucopenia (39%) and neutropenia (33%). The most common grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicity was fatigue (17%).

conclusionsThe combination of ixabepilone and cetuximab was active and had acceptable toxicity. The efficacy results are similar to single-agent ixabepilone and gemcitabine-based combination therapies in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Exploratory analyses suggest a trend toward improved survival for patients who experienced rash.

Identifiers

PMID23112883
PMCPMC3481147
OpenAlexW33296887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.