ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2012
Lab-on-a-chip pathogen sensors for food safety.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- Food-borne bacterial pathogens: emerging approaches in detection and prevention.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Recent Developments onFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Strategic Detection ofBiosensors · 2025Review
- Integrated Photonic Biosensors: Enabling Next-Generation Lab-on-a-Chip Platforms.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- An Integrated Photonic Biosensing Platform for Pathogen Detection in Aquaculture.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Recent Progress on Microfluidics Integrated with Fiber-Optic Sensors for On-Site Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Article
- Development of Optical Label-Free Biosensor Method in Detection ofSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Polymeric and Paper-Based Lab-on-a-Chip Devices in Food Safety: A Review.Micromachines · 2023Review
- Lab-on-a-Chip Electrochemical Biosensors for Foodborne Pathogen Detection: A Review of Common Standards and Recent Progress.Biosensors · 2023Review
- Mixing Performance of a Planar Asymmetric Contraction-and-Expansion Micromixer.Micromachines · 2022Article
- A Technique for Rapid Bacterial-Density Enumeration through Membrane Filtration and Differential Pressure Measurements.Micromachines · 2022Article
- Advances, applications, and limitations of portable and rapid detection technologies for routinely encountered foodborne pathogens.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- Application of MinION sequencing as a tool for the rapid detection and characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Lab-on-a-chip technologies for food safety, processing, and packaging applications: a review.Environmental chemistry letters · 2022Review
- Portable on-chip colorimetric biosensing platform integrated with a smartphone for label/PCR-free detection of Cryptosporidium RNA.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Impact of Silanization Parameters and Antibody Immobilization Strategy on Binding Capacity of Photonic Ring Resonators.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Efficiency of the Q3 lab-on-chip Real Time-PCR platform for detecting protozoan pathogens in bivalve mollusks.Journal of food science and technology · 2019Article
- Design and Development of Photonic Biosensors for Swine Viral Diseases Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- "The Smartphone's Guide to the Galaxy": In Situ Analysis in Space.Biosensors · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There have been a number of cases of foodborne illness among humans that are caused by pathogens such as Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella typhimurium, etc. The current practices to detect such pathogenic agents are cell culturing, immunoassays, or polymerase chain reactions (PCRs). These methods are essentially laboratory-based methods that are not at all real-time and thus unavailable for early-monitoring of such pathogens. They are also very difficult to implement in the field. Lab-on-a-chip biosensors, however, have a strong potential to be used in the field since they can be miniaturized and automated; they are also potentially fast and very sensitive. These lab-on-a-chip biosensors can detect pathogens in farms, packaging/processing facilities, delivery/distribution systems, and at the consumer level. There are still several issues to be resolved before applying these lab-on-a-chip sensors to field applications, including the pre-treatment of a sample, proper storage of reagents, full integration into a battery-powered system, and demonstration of very high sensitivity, which are addressed in this review article. Several different types of lab-on-a-chip biosensors, including immunoassay- and PCR-based, have been developed and tested for detecting foodborne pathogens. Their assay performance, including detection limit and assay time, are also summarized. Finally, the use of optical fibers or optical waveguide is discussed as a means to improve the portability and sensitivity of lab-on-a-chip pathogen sensors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.