Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23112285›Full record

ArticleBMJ quality & safety2012

"It's like two worlds apart": an analysis of vulnerable patient handover practices at discharge from hospital.

Raluca Oana Groene, Carola Orrego, Rosa Suñol, Paul Barach, Oliver Groene

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ quality & safety, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Patient safety in marginalised groups: a narrative scoping review.International journal for equity in health · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Raluca Oana GroeneFaculty of Health and Social Care, London South Bank University, Keyworth Street, K2 Building, London SE1 6NG, UK. groener@lsbu.ac.uk
Carola Orrego
Rosa Suñol
Paul Barach
Oliver Groene

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHandover practices at hospital discharge are relatively under-researched, particularly as regards the specific risks and additional requirements for handovers involving vulnerable patients with limited language, cognitive and social resources.

objectiveTo explore handover practices at discharge and to focus on the patients' role in handovers and on the potential additional risks for vulnerable patients.

methodsWe conducted qualitative interviews with patients, hospital professionals and primary care professionals in two hospitals and their associated primary care centres in Catalonia, Spain.

resultsWe identified handover practices at discharge that potentially put patients at risk. Patients did not feel empowered in the handover but were expected to transfer information between care providers. Professionals identified lack of medication reconciliation at discharge, loss of discharge information, and absence of plans for follow-up care in the community as quality and safety problems for discharge handovers. These occurred for all patients, but appeared to be more frequent and have a greater negative effect in patients with limited language comprehension and/or lack of family and social support systems.

conclusionsDischarge handovers are often haphazard. Healthcare professionals do not consider current handover practices safe, with patients expected to transfer information without being empowered to understand and act on it. This can lead to misinformation, omission or duplication of tests or interventions and, potentially, patient harm. Vulnerable patients may be at greater risk given their limited language, cognitive and social resources. Patient safety at discharge could benefit from strategies to enhance patient education and promote empowerment.

Indexed as

Patient HandoffProfessional-Patient RelationsVulnerable PopulationsAgedAged, 80 and overCatchment Area, HealthChronic DiseaseContinuity of Patient CareElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMedical ErrorsMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID23112285
PMCPMC3551198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.