Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23112091›Full record

ArticleArthritis and rheumatism2012

Comparison of autoantibody specificities between traditional and bead-based assays in a large, diverse collection of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and family members.

Benjamin F Bruner, Joel M Guthridge, Rufei Lu, Gabriel Vidal, Jennifer A Kelly, Julie M Robertson, Diane L Kamen, Gary S Gilkeson, Barbara R Neas, Morris Reichlin and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis and rheumatism, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Autoantibodies against Neurologic Antigens in Nonneurologic Autoimmunity.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2019
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin F BrunerOklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, USA.
Joel M Guthridge
Rufei Lu
Gabriel Vidal
Jennifer A Kelly
Julie M Robertson
Diane L Kamen
Gary S Gilkeson
Barbara R Neas
Morris Reichlin
R Hal Scofield
John B Harley
Judith A James
Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation · USUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · USMedical University of South Carolina · USCincinnati VA Medical Center · US

Funding

THE EFFECTS OF ERK PATHWAY INHIBITION ON DNA METHYLATION IN SLEP20RR015577 · NCRR · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI CENTOLA, MICHAEL B · 2000 to 2009
$21.5M
VALIDATING NOVEL GENES IMPLICATED IN LEUKOCYTE CHEMOTAXISP20RR020143 · NCRR · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI GAFFNEY, PATRICK M · 2004 to 2011
$21.0M
Program Project in the Genetics of SLEP01AR049084 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI KIMBERLY, ROBERT P. · 2002 to 2012
$12.7M
SOUTH CAROLINA CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE (SCTR)UL1RR029882 · NCRR · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T. · 2009 to 2011
$10.1M
South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)UL1TR000062 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T. · 2012 to 2014
$9.4M
HLA GENE COMPLEMENTATION IN PRIMARY SJOGREN'S AND LUPUSR01AI024717 · NIAID · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI KOTTYAN, LEAH CLAIRE, WEIRAUCH, MATTHEW TYSON · 1987 to 2025
$7.8M
SNP Confirmation and High Throughput Genotyping CoreP30AR053483 · NIAMS · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI GUTHRIDGE, JOEL MARVIN · 2007 to 2017
$6.7M
Pre-Clinical Studies to Identify SLE Therapeutic TargetsU19AI082714 · NIAID · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI GAFFNEY, PATRICK M · 2009 to 2018
$6.2M
Sphingosine Kinase in Systemic Sclerosis (Scleroderma)P60AR049459 · NIAMS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI SILVER, RICHARD M. · 2003 to 2007
$6.0M
Patient Resource CoreP60AR062755 · NIAMS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI KAMEN, DIANE L · 2012 to 2016
$5.8M
Genetic Linkage in LupusR37AI024717 · NIAID · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI HARLEY, JOHN BARKER · 2005 to 2014
$4.2M
Science in a Culture of MentoringP30GM103510 · NIGMS · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI JAMES, JUDITH A · 2012 to 2016
$3.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000062NCRR NIH HHS P20-RR-015577-10S1NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR020143NCRR NIH HHS P20-RR-020143NCRR NIH HHS P30 RR031152NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR026735NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR029882NCRR NIH HHS UL1-RR-029882NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI024717NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI031584NIAID NIH HHS R01-AI-031584NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI024717NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI101934NIAID NIH HHS U01-AI-101934NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI082714NIAID NIH HHS U19-AI-082714NIAMS NIH HHS N01-AR-6-2277NIAMS NIH HHS P01 AR049084NIAMS NIH HHS P01-AR-049084NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR053483NIAMS NIH HHS P30-AR-053483NIAMS NIH HHS P60 AR049459NIAMS NIH HHS P60-AR-049459NIAMS NIH HHS P60 AR062755NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM103510NIGMS NIH HHS P30-GM-103510
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveReplacement of standard immunofluorescence methods with bead-based assays for antinuclear antibody (ANA) testing is a new clinical option. The aim of this study was to evaluate a large, multiethnic cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), blood relatives, and unaffected control individuals for familial aggregation and subset clustering of autoantibodies by high-throughput serum screening technology and traditional methods.

methodsSerum samples (1,540 SLE patients, 1,154 unaffected relatives, and 906 healthy, population-based controls) were analyzed for SLE autoantibodies using a bead-based assay, indirect immunofluorescence (IIF), and immunodiffusion. Autoantibody prevalence, sensitivity for disease detection, clustering of autoantibodies, and associations between newer methods and standard immunodiffusion results were evaluated.

resultsThe frequencies of ANAs in the sera from African American, Hispanic, and European American patients with SLE were 89%, 73%, and 67%, respectively, by BioPlex 2200 bead-based assay and 94%, 84%, and 86%, respectively, by IIF. When comparing the serum prevalence of 60-kd Ro, La, Sm, nuclear RNP A, and ribosomal P autoantibodies across assays, the sensitivity of detection ranged from 0.92 to 0.83 and the specificity ranged from 0.90 to 0.79. Autoantibody cluster analysis showed associations of autoantibody specificities in 3 subsets: 1) 60 kd Ro, 52-kd Ro, and La, 2) spliceosomal proteins, and 3) double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), chromatin, and ribosomal P. Familial aggregation of Sm/RNP, ribosomal P, and 60-kd Ro in SLE patient sibling pairs was observed (P ≤ 0.004). Simplex-pedigree SLE patients had a greater prevalence of dsDNA (P = 0.0003) and chromatin (P = 0.005) autoantibodies compared to patients with a multiplex SLE pedigree.

conclusionThe frequencies of ANAs detected by a bead-based assay are lower than those detected by IIF in European American patients with SLE. These assays have strong positive predictive values across ethnic groups, provide useful information for clinical care, and provide unique insights into familial aggregation and autoantibody clustering.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntibodies, AntinuclearAntibody SpecificityAsianAutoantibodiesBlack or African AmericanEthnicityFamilyFemaleFluorescent Antibody Technique, IndirectHispanic or LatinoHumansImmunodiffusionLupus Erythematosus, SystemicMaleAntibodies, AntinuclearAutoantibodiesRibosomal ProteinsSS-A antibodies

Identifiers

PMID23112091
PMCPMC3490432
OpenAlexW2013635565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.