Trial reportEuropean journal of heart failure2013
High prevalence of undetected heart failure in long-term care residents: findings from the Heart Failure in Care Homes (HFinCH) study.
Trial report in European journal of heart failure, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.
- Natriuretic peptides for heart failure screening in nursing homes: a systematic review.Heart failure reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Trial
- Trial
- Feasibility of evidence-based diagnosis and management of heart failure in older people in care: a pilot randomised controlled trial.BMC geriatrics · 2012Trial
- What services are currently provided to people with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in the UK and what are their components? A systematic scoping review.European journal of cardiovascular nursing · 2026Article
- Noninvasive Screening for Elevated LVEDP and Health Status in Outpatients at Risk for Heart Failure.JACC. Advances · 2025Article
- Comparison of the effects of metformin and empagliflozin on cardiac function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction mice.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Diagnosing and managing patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a consensus survey.BMJ open · 2024Observational
- Lessons learnt from HF coding in primary care. What might best practice look like?The British journal of cardiology · 2024Article
- The diagnostic value of chest X-ray scanning by the help of Artificial Intelligence in Heart Failure (ART-IN-HF).Clinical cardiology · 2023Article
- Characterizing Canadian long-term care home consumed foods and their inflammatory potential: a secondary analysis.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Reference Ranges for NT-proBNP (N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide) and Risk Factors for Higher NT-proBNP Concentrations in a Large General Population Cohort.Circulation. Heart failure · 2022Article
- Clinical implications of the universal definition for the prevention and treatment of heart failure.Clinical cardiology · 2022Review
- Primary care heart failure service identifies a missed cohort of heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction.European heart journal · 2022Article
- Reliability of the blood pressure response during performance of bedside Valsalva maneuver and association with NT-pBNP levels.Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2021Article
- Optimisation of Heart Failure Management in Nursing Homes Using Point-of-Care Ultrasonography: Harmonious Trial Rationale and Design.Zdravstveno varstvo · 2020Article
- SGLT2 Inhibitors: Cardiovascular Benefits Beyond HbA1c-Translating Evidence into Practice.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2019Review
- Think-aloud study about the diagnosis of chronic heart failure in Belgian general practice.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Chronic heart failure management in primary healthcare in Poland: Results of a nationwide cross-sectional study.The European journal of general practice · 2018Article
- [Chronic heart failure in older patients : Updated national healthcare guidelines on chronic heart failure from a geriatric perspective].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
aimsDiagnosis of heart failure in older people in long-term care is challenging because of co-morbidities, cognitive deficit, polypharmacy, immobility, and poor access to services. This study aimed to ascertain heart failure prevalence and clinical management in this population. METHODS AND
resultsA total of 405 residents, aged 65-100 years, in 33 UK care facilities were prospectively enrolled between April 2009 and June 2010. The presence of heart failure was determined using European Society of Cardiology guidelines, modified where necessary for immobility. Evaluation of symptoms and signs, functional capacity, and quality of life, portable on-site echocardiography, and medical record review were completed in 399 cases. The point prevalence of heart failure was 22.8% [n = 91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 18.8-27.2%]; of these, 62.7% (n = 57, 95% CI 59.6-66.5%) had heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and 37.3% had left ventricular systolic dysfunction (n = 34, 95% CI 34.8-40.5%). A total of 76% (n = 61) of previous diagnoses of heart failure were not confirmed, and up to 90% (n = 82) of study cases were new. No symptoms or signs were reliable predictors of heart failure.
conclusionHeart failure was diagnosed in almost a quarter of residents: the prevalence was substantially higher than in other populations. The majority of heart failure cases were undiagnosed, while three-quarters of previously recorded cases were misdiagnosed. Common symptoms and signs appear to have little clinical utility in this population. Early, accurate differential diagnosis is key to the effective management of heart failure; this may be failing in long-term care facilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.