Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23111006›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2013

Air pollution from industrial swine operations and blood pressure of neighboring residents.

Steve Wing, Rachel Avery Horton, Kathryn M Rose

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Industrial odour pollution and human health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Evaluating the environmental justice dimensions of odor in Denver, Colorado.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Residents' experiences during a hydrogen sulfide crisis in Carson, California.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Rapid Health Impact Assessment of a Proposed Poultry Processing Plant in Millsboro, Delaware.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  16. "Ag-Gag" Laws: Evolution, Resurgence, and Public Health Implications.New solutions : a journal of environmental and occupational health policy : NS · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Steve WingDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina–Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7400, USA. steve_wing@unc.edu
Rachel Avery Horton
Kathryn M Rose
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Stephanie Engel · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
Biostatstics for Research in Environmental HealthT32ES007018 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Stephanie Engel, Rebecca Fry · 1985 to 2026
$31.3M
Community Health Effects of Industrial Hog OperationsR01ES011359 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WING, STEVEN B · 2001 to 2005
$1.7M
NIEHS NIH HHS 5-T32-ES07018NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES011359NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndustrial swine operations emit odorant chemicals including ammonia, hydrogen sulfide (H2S), and volatile organic compounds. Malodor and pollutant concentrations have been associated with self-reported stress and altered mood in prior studies.

objectivesWe conducted a repeated-measures study of air pollution, stress, and blood pressure in neighbors of swine operations.

methodsFor approximately 2 weeks, 101 nonsmoking adult volunteers living near industrial swine operations in 16 neighborhoods in eastern North Carolina sat outdoors for 10 min twice daily at preselected times. Afterward, they reported levels of hog odor on a 9-point scale and measured their blood pressure twice using an automated oscillometric device. During the same 2- to 3-week period, we measured ambient levels of H2S and PM10 at a central location in each neighborhood. Associations between systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP, respectively) and pollutant measures were estimated using fixed-effects (conditional) linear regression with adjustment for time of day.

resultsPM10 showed little association with blood pressure. DBP [β (SE)] increased 0.23 (0.08) mmHg per unit of reported hog odor during the 10 min outdoors and 0.12 (0.08) mmHg per 1-ppb increase of H2S concentration in the same hour. SBP increased 0.10 (0.12) mmHg per odor unit and 0.29 (0.12) mmHg per 1-ppb increase of H2S in the same hour. Reported stress was strongly associated with BP; adjustment for stress reduced the odor-DBP association, but the H2S-SBP association changed little.

conclusionsLike noise and other repetitive environmental stressors, malodors may be associated with acute blood pressure increases that could contribute to development of chronic hypertension.

Indexed as

SwineAir PollutantsAir PollutionAnimalsBlood PressureIndustrial WasteParticulate MatterAir PollutantsIndustrial WasteParticulate Matter

Identifiers

PMID23111006
PMCPMC3553433
OpenAlexW1194384553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.