Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23110897›Full record

ReviewThe Plant cell2012

Multiscale systems analysis of root growth and development: modeling beyond the network and cellular scales.

Leah R Band, John A Fozard, Christophe Godin, Oliver E Jensen, Tony Pridmore, Malcolm J Bennett, John R King

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Plant cell, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Tree Topology Estimation.IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
  14. New insights into root gravitropic signalling.Journal of experimental botany · 2015
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Leah R BandCentre for Plant Integrative Biology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham LE12 5RD, United Kingdom.
John A Fozard
Christophe Godin
Oliver E Jensen
Tony Pridmore
Malcolm J Bennett
John R King

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/D019613/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G023972/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H020314/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over recent decades, we have gained detailed knowledge of many processes involved in root growth and development. However, with this knowledge come increasing complexity and an increasing need for mechanistic modeling to understand how those individual processes interact. One major challenge is in relating genotypes to phenotypes, requiring us to move beyond the network and cellular scales, to use multiscale modeling to predict emergent dynamics at the tissue and organ levels. In this review, we highlight recent developments in multiscale modeling, illustrating how these are generating new mechanistic insights into the regulation of root growth and development. We consider how these models are motivating new biological data analysis and explore directions for future research. This modeling progress will be crucial as we move from a qualitative to an increasingly quantitative understanding of root biology, generating predictive tools that accelerate the development of improved crop varieties.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksModels, BiologicalCell CommunicationGenotypeHydrodynamicsPhenotypePlant CellsPlant DevelopmentPlant Growth RegulatorsPlant RootsPlantsPlant Growth Regulators

Identifiers

PMID23110897
PMCPMC3517226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.