SynthesisNeuroImage2013
Spatial smoothing systematically biases the localization of reward-related brain activity.
Synthesis in NeuroImage, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functional magnetic response imaging predictors of alcohol use disorder treatment outcome: a systematic review.Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford, Oxfordshire) · 2026Pooled it
- Distinct brain structural abnormalities in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and substance use disorders: A comparative meta-analysis.Translational psychiatry · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Brain activations associated with anticipation and delivery of monetary reward: A systematic review and meta-analysis of fMRI studies.PloS one · 2021Pooled it
- Spatial migration of human reward processing with functional development: Evidence from quantitative meta-analyses.Human brain mapping · 2020Pooled it
- A Functional Neuroimaging Meta-Analysis of Self-Related Processing in Schizophrenia.Frontiers in neurology · 2019Pooled it
- Reinforcement learning models and their neural correlates: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2015Pooled it
- Testosterone rapidly increases neural reactivity to threat in healthy men: a novel two-step pharmacological challenge paradigm.Biological psychiatry · 2014Trial
- Control of nucleus accumbens activity with neurofeedback.NeuroImage · 2014Trial
- Dissociating motivation from reward in human striatal activity.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2014Trial
- Distinct neural substrates of obsessions and compulsions in adolescent obsessive compulsive disorder.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
- Prior novelty invigorates future mesolimbic target detection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Prior Novelty Invigorates Future Mesolimbic Target Detection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Impact of impulsivity on the relationship of the brain structures with school performance.NPJ science of learning · 2025Article
- Meta-Analysis Reveals That Explore-Exploit Decisions are Dissociable by Activation in the Dorsal Lateral Prefrontal Cortex, Anterior Insula, and the Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Design, construction and validation of a magnetic particle imaging (MPI) system for human brain imaging.Physics in medicine and biology · 2025Article
- Age- and sex-related differences in social competence and emotion labeling in pre-adolescence.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2025Article
- Gait dynamics and brain function abnormalities in Parkinson's disease with freezing of gait: a clinical study using resting-state fMRI and wearable devices.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Article
- Impact of analytic decisions on test-retest reliability of individual and group estimates in functional magnetic resonance imaging: A multiverse analysis using the monetary incentive delay task.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Neuroimaging methods with enhanced spatial resolution such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) suggest that the subcortical striatum plays a critical role in human reward processing. Analysis of FMRI data requires several preprocessing steps, some of which entail tradeoffs. For instance, while spatial smoothing can enhance statistical power, it may also bias localization towards regions that contain more gray than white matter. In a meta-analysis and reanalysis of an existing dataset, we sought to determine whether spatial smoothing could systematically bias the spatial localization of foci related to reward anticipation in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc). An activation likelihood estimate (ALE) meta-analysis revealed that peak ventral striatal ALE foci for studies that used smaller spatial smoothing kernels (i.e. <6mm FWHM) were more anterior than those identified for studies that used larger kernels (i.e. >7mm FWHM). Additionally, subtraction analysis of findings for studies that used smaller versus larger smoothing kernels revealed a significant cluster of differential activity in the left relatively anterior NAcc (Talairach coordinates: -10, 9, -1). A second meta-analysis revealed that larger smoothing kernels were correlated with more posterior localizations of NAcc activation foci (p<0.015), but revealed no significant associations with other potentially relevant parameters (including voxel volume, magnet strength, and publication date). Finally, repeated analysis of a representative dataset processed at different smoothing kernels (i.e., 0-12mm) also indicated that smoothing systematically yielded more posterior activation foci in the NAcc (p<0.005). Taken together, these findings indicate that spatial smoothing can systematically bias the spatial localization of striatal activity. These findings have implications both for historical interpretation of past findings related to reward processing and for the analysis of future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.