Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23110535›Full record

ReviewCurrent topics in medicinal chemistry2012

Rational prediction with molecular dynamics for hit identification.

Sara E Nichols, Robert V Swift, Rommie E Amaro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current topics in medicinal chemistry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Interference of small compounds and MgScientific reports · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Knowledge-Based Methods To Train and Optimize Virtual Screening Ensembles.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2016
    Article
  6. All-Atom Molecular Dynamics of Virus Capsids as Drug Targets.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sara E NicholsDepartment of Pharmacology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA. senichols@ucsd.edu
Robert V Swift
Rommie E Amaro

Funding

A Structural Systems Biology Approach to Drug DiscoveryDP2OD007237 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI AMARO, ROMMIE E · 2010 to 2015
$2.9M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIH HHS DP2 OD007237NIH HHS DP2-OD007237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the motions of proteins are fundamental for their function, for pragmatic reasons, the consideration of protein elasticity has traditionally been neglected in drug discovery and design. This review details protein motion, its relevance to biomolecular interactions and how it can be sampled using molecular dynamics simulations. Within this context, two major areas of research in structure-based prediction that can benefit from considering protein flexibility, binding site detection and molecular docking, are discussed. Basic classification metrics and statistical analysis techniques, which can facilitate performance analysis, are also reviewed. With hardware and software advances, molecular dynamics in combination with traditional structure-based prediction methods can potentially reduce the time and costs involved in the hit identification pipeline.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationBinding SitesComputational BiologyDrug DesignDrug DiscoveryDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalMolecular Docking SimulationProteinsROC CurveSoftwareProteins

Identifiers

PMID23110535
PMCPMC3636520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.