Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23110191›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

High risk HPV contamination of endocavity vaginal ultrasound probes: an underestimated route of nosocomial infection?

Jean-sebastien Casalegno, Karine Le Bail Carval, Daniel Eibach, Marie-Laure Valdeyron, Gery Lamblin, Hervé Jacquemoud, Georges Mellier, Bruno Lina, Pascal Gaucherand, Patrice Mathevet and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Mouse Papillomavirus Outbreak in a Research Facility.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Guidelines for Reprocessing Ultrasound Transducers.Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine · 2017
    Article
  20. Advancing infection control in Australasian medical ultrasound practice.Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Jean-sebastien CasalegnoLaboratory of Virology, Centre de Biologie et Pathologie Est, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France. jean-sebastien.casalegno@chu-lyon.fr
Karine Le Bail Carval
Daniel Eibach
Marie-Laure Valdeyron
Gery Lamblin
Hervé Jacquemoud
Georges Mellier
Bruno Lina
Pascal Gaucherand
Patrice Mathevet
Yahia Mekki
Hospices Civils de Lyon · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndocavity ultrasound is seen as a harmless procedure and has become a common gynaecological procedure. However without correct disinfection, it may result in nosocomial transmission of genito-urinary pathogens, such as high-risk Human Papillomavirus (HR-HPV). We aimed to evaluate the currently recommended disinfection procedure for covered endocavity ultrasound probes, which consists of "Low Level Disinfection" (LLD) with "quaternary ammonium compounds" containing wipes.

methodsFrom May to October 2011 swabs were taken from endovaginal ultrasound probes at the Gynecology Department of the Lyon University Hospital. During the first phase (May-June 2011) samples were taken after the ultrasound examination and after the LLD procedure. In a second phase (July-October 2011) swab samples were collected just before the probe was used. All samples were tested for the presence of human DNA (as a marker for a possible transmission of infectious pathogens from the genital tract) and HPV DNA with the Genomica DNA microarray (35 different HPV genotypes).

resultsWe collected 217 samples before and 200 samples after the ultrasound examination. The PCR was inhibited in two cases. Human DNA was detected in 36 (18%) post-examination samples and 61 (28%) pre-examination samples. After the ultrasound LLD procedure, 6 (3.0%) samples contained HR-HPV types (16, 31, 2×53 and 58). Similarly, HPV was detected in 6 pre-examination samples (2.7%). Amongst these 4 (1.9%) contained HR-HPV (types 53 and 70).

conclusionOur study reveals that a considerable number of ultrasound probes are contaminated with human and HR-HPV DNA, despite LLD disinfection and probe cover. In all hospitals, where LLD is performed, the endovaginal ultrasound procedure must therefore be considered a source for nosocomial HR-HPV infections. We recommend the stringent use of high-level disinfectants, such as glutaraldehyde or hydrogen peroxide solutions.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective Agents, LocalCross InfectionDisinfectantsDisinfectionDNA, ViralEquipment ContaminationFemaleGlutaralHumansHydrogen PeroxidePapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsPolymerase Chain ReactionProspective StudiesTime FactorsUltrasonographyAnti-Infective Agents, LocalDisinfectantsDNA, ViralGlutaralHydrogen Peroxide

Identifiers

PMID23110191
PMCPMC3480505
OpenAlexW2017221751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.