Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23110157›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2012

Ultra-brief intervention for problem drinkers: results from a randomized controlled trial.

John A Cunningham, Clayton Neighbors, Cameron Wild, Keith Humphreys

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00688584 nacompletednot on this map

Ultra-brief Intervention for Problem Drinkers

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthRan2008 to 2010Enrolled1,767ConditionsProblem Drinking, AlcoholismArmsPamphlet-based personalized alcohol feedback (PAF), control pamphlet condition
NCT02246361 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Six Patient Information Leaflets (PIL) on Doctor Patient Communication and Adherence in Emergency Ward

TypeinterventionalSponsorFloralisRan2014 to 2015Enrolled211ConditionsAnkle Sprain, Infectious Colitis, Diverticulitis, PyelonephritisArmsPatient Information Leaflet (PIL)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

John A CunninghamCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. John_Cunningham@camh.net
Clayton Neighbors
Cameron Wild
Keith Humphreys
Stanford Medicine · USUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Houston · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Ultra-brief intervention for problem drinkersR01AA015680 · NIAAA · CENTRE FOR ADDICTION AND MENTAL HEALTH · PI CUNNINGHAM, JOHN A · 2008 to 2011
$1.0M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA015680NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA015680-01A2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are a number of evidence-based, in-person clinical inteventions for problem drinkers, but most problem drinkers will never seek such treatments. Reaching the population of non-treatment seeking problem drinkers will require a different approach. Accordingly, this randomized clinical trial evaluated an intervention that has been validated in clinical settings and then modified into an ultra-brief format suitable for use as an indicated public health intervention (i.e., targeting the population of non-treatment seeking problem drinkers). METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsProblem drinkers (N = 1767) completed a baseline population telephone survey and then were randomized to one of three conditions - a personalized feedback pamphlet condition, a control pamphlet condition, or a no intervention control condition. In the week after the baseline survey, households in the two pamphlet conditions were sent their respective interventions by postal mail addressed to 'Check Your Drinking.' Changes in drinking were assessed post intervention at three-month and six-month follow-ups. The follow-up rate was 86% at three-months and 76% at six-months. There was a small effect (p = .04) in one of three outcome variables (reduction in AUDIT-C, a composite measure of quantity and frequency of drinking) observed for the personalized feedback pamphlet compared to the no intervention control. No significant differences (p>.05) between groups were observed for the other two outcome variables - number of drinks consumed in the past seven days and highest number of drinks on one occasion. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Based on the results of this study, we tentatively conclude that a brief intervention, modified to an ultra-brief, public health format can have a meaningful impact.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00688584.

Indexed as

PamphletsAdultAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholismFeedbackFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicPublic HealthTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID23110157
PMCPMC3480504
OpenAlexW1990086225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.