Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23109879›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2012

Mechanisms of ovarian cancer metastasis: biochemical pathways.

Kentaro Nakayama, Naomi Nakayama, Hiroshi Katagiri, Kohji Miyazaki

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bioscience reports · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Surgical treatment of ovarian cancer liver metastasis.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kentaro NakayamaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shimane University School of Medicine, Izumo 693-8501, Japan.
Naomi NakayamaDepartment of Biochemistry, Shimane University School of Medicine, Izumo 693-8501, Japan.
Hiroshi KatagiriDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shimane University School of Medicine, Izumo 693-8501, Japan.
Kohji MiyazakiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shimane University School of Medicine, Izumo 693-8501, Japan.
Shimane University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy. Despite advances in chemotherapy, the five-year survival rate of advanced ovarian cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis remains around 30%. The most significant prognostic factor is stage, and most patients present at an advanced stage with peritoneal dissemination. There is often no clearly identifiable precursor lesion; therefore, the events leading to metastatic disease are poorly understood. This article reviews metastatic suppressor genes, the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and the tumor microenvironment as they relate to ovarian cancer metastasis. Additionally, novel chemotherapeutic agents targeting the metastasis-related biochemical pathways are discussed.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionGenes, Tumor SuppressorOvarian NeoplasmsTumor MicroenvironmentAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsFemaleHumansNeoplasm MetastasisAntineoplastic AgentscancerEMTmetastasis suppressor genetumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID23109879
PMCPMC3472771
OpenAlexW2046291524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.