Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23109398›Full record

ArticleContrast media & molecular imaging

In vivo real-time lymphatic draining using quantum-dot optical imaging in mice.

Nobuyuki Kosaka, Makoto Mitsunaga, Peter L Choyke, Hisataka Kobayashi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contrast media & molecular imaging. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Fluorescent Tracers forFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. In vivo biodistribution and behavior of CdTe/ZnS quantum dots.International journal of nanomedicine · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Nanoparticles: take only pictures, leave only footprints.Science translational medicine · 2014
    Article
  8. Emerging lymphatic imaging technologies for mouse and man.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2014
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nobuyuki KosakaMolecular Imaging Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1088, USA.
Makoto Mitsunaga
Peter L Choyke
Hisataka Kobayashi

Funding

Lymphatic ImagingZIABC010654 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI CHOYKE, PETER L · 2009 to 2020
$4.8M
Angiogenesis imagingZIABC010714 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI CHOYKE, PETER L · 2009 to 2015
$4.7M
Lymphatic ImagingZ01BC010654 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI CHOYKE, PETER L · 2005 to 2008
$1.1M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC010654
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lymphatic system is essential for fluid regulation and for the maintenance of host immunity. However, in vivo lymph flow is difficult to track in real time, because of the lack of an appropriate imaging method. In this study, we combined macro-zoom fluorescence microscopy with quantum-dot (Qdot) optical lymphatic imaging to develop an in vivo real-time optical lymphatic imaging method that allows the tracking of lymph through lymphatic channels and into lymph nodes. After interstitial injection of Qdots in a mouse, rapid visualization of the cervical lymphatics and cervical lymph nodes was achieved. Real-time monitoring of the injected Qdots revealed that the cortex of the node enhanced first followed by a net-like pattern in the central portion of the node. Histology revealed that the rim and net-like enhancing regions corresponded to the subcapsular sinuses and medullary sinuses respectively. Additionally, multiplexed two-color real-time lymphatic tracking was performed with two different Qdots. With this real-time imaging system, we successfully tracked microscopic lymphatic flow in vivo. This method could have a potential impact for lymphatic research in visualizing normal or abnormal functional lymphatic flows.

Indexed as

LymphQuantum DotsAnimalsLymph NodesMiceMicroscopy, FluorescenceTomography, Optical

Identifiers

PMID23109398
PMCPMC6417793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.