Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23109374›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2012

Field evaluation of a PCR test for Schistosoma japonicum egg detection in low-prevalence regions of China.

Mai S Fung, Ning Xiao, Shuo Wang, Elizabeth J Carlton

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. A mini review on advances in diagnostic techniques forFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. DNA Diagnostics for Schistosomiasis Control.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2018
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Advances in the Diagnosis of Human Schistosomiasis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2015
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Good things are worth waiting for.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mai S FungEnvironmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California-Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. maifung@berkeley.edu
Ning Xiao
Shuo Wang
Elizabeth J Carlton
University of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Determinants of Schistosomiasis Re-emergenceR01AI068854 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI SPEAR, ROBERT C · 2007 to 2011
$2.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI068854NIAID NIH HHS R01AI068854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensitive Schistosoma japonicum detection methods are needed to progress from schistosomiasis control to elimination. The sensitivity of the Kato-Katz thick smear and miracidium hatching tests decrease with infection intensity and serological tests cannot always identify current infections. We evaluated a fecal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay to detect S. japonicum infection in 106 humans and 8 bovines in China. PCR was highly sensitive, detecting S. japonicum DNA at 0.5 eggs/g of stool. Comparing PCR examination of a single stool sample to the miracidium hatching test using three consecutive stool samples, more humans were hatching test positive (20%) than PCR positive (15%). However, two individuals were PCR positive in a village where no infections were detected by coprological methods. The sensitivity of PCR makes it a promising tool for schistosomiasis diagnostics and screening, although egg shedding variability and stool sample size present challenges for any detection method in low-transmission areas.

Indexed as

Schistosoma japonicumAnimalsChinaHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionPrevalenceReproducibility of ResultsSchistosomiasis japonicaSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID23109374
PMCPMC3516074
OpenAlexW2149672986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.