ArticleMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG2012
In silico prediction of mRNA poly(A) sites in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.
Article in Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The separation between mRNA-ends is more variable than expected.FEBS open bio · 2024Article
- Stress responses of plants through transcriptome plasticity by mRNA alternative polyadenylation.Molecular horticulture · 2023Review
- A Survey on Methods for Predicting Polyadenylation Sites from DNA Sequences, Bulk RNA-seq, and Single-cell RNA-seq.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2023Review
- Comparative analysis of alternative splicing, alternative polyadenylation and the expression of the two KIN genes from cytoplasmic male sterility cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata L.).Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2014Article
- The Advances in Deep Learning Modeling of Polyadenylation Codes.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNAReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurately predicting polyadenylation [poly(A)] sites is important for defining the end of genes and understanding gene regulation mechanisms. Alternative polyadenylation (APA) has been demonstrated to play an important role in transcriptome diversity and regulating gene expression. To accurately predict poly(A) and APA sites in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, a green alga that can be used to produce renewable energy, we proposed a novel model that integrated five methods for representing the features of these sites with a combined classifier. We presented a new grouping method based on pattern assembly to classify the poly(A) sites into four groups. We used five methods, involving the predicted RNA secondary structure, the term frequency-inverse document frequency weight, first-order Markov chain, pentamer ratio and a position weight matrix, to generate the feature space. We then developed a heuristic method to form the combined classifier by weighting multiple classifiers to predict poly(A) sites in each group. The high specificity and sensitivity of this model were demonstrated by testing the four groups of poly(A) sites and the intronic APA sites. The average prediction performance was approximately 8 % higher than the performance of a previous prediction model. For the group without any conserved patterns, the prediction accuracy was 9 % higher than for the accuracy with the previous technique. However, the prediction efficiency of this group was still significantly lower than that of the other groups, indicating the importance of identifying additional signal patterns for poly(A) site prediction. We also predicted the alternative poly(A) sites in introns with good accuracy. This prediction model was designed to be easily expanded with new classifiers or new features. Therefore, this model is applicable to new data or other species. Our model will be useful both in genome annotation because it predicts the end of a mature transcript and in genetic engineering because it enables researchers to eliminate undesirable poly(A) sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23108961What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.