Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23108148›Full record

ReviewResearch in microbiology

Microbial manipulation of the amyloid fold.

William H DePas, Matthew R Chapman

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Research in microbiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Journal of biological chemistry · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

William H DePasDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0620, USA. whdepas@umich.edu
Matthew R Chapman
University of Michigan · US

Funding

PREDOCTORAL TRAINING IN GENETICST32GM007544 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MORAN, JOHN V. · 1985 to 2022
$11.3M
Assembly of Curli Fibers by Escherichia coliR01AI073847 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHAPMAN, MATTHEW RICHARD · 2007 to 2011
$1.8M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI073847NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007544NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007544-32PHS HHS R01 A1073847
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial biofilms are encased in a protein, DNA, and polysaccharide matrix that protects the community, promotes interactions with the environment, and helps cells adhere together. The protein component of these matrices is often a remarkably stable, β-sheet-rich polymer called amyloid. Amyloids form ordered, self-templating fibers that are highly aggregative, making them a valuable biofilm component. Some eukaryotic proteins inappropriately adopt the amyloid fold, and these misfolded protein aggregates disrupt normal cellular proteostasis, which can cause significant cytotoxicity. Indeed, until recently amyloids were considered solely the result of protein misfolding. However, research over the past decade has revealed how various organisms have capitalized on the amyloid fold by developing sophisticated biogenesis pathways that coordinate gene expression, protein folding, and secretion so that amyloid-related toxicities are minimized. How microbes manipulate amyloids, by augmenting their advantageous properties and by reducing their undesirable properties, will be the subject of this review.

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaAmyloidBacterial ProteinsBiofilmsModels, MolecularProtein FoldingProtein MultimerizationAmyloidBacterial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23108148
PMCPMC3532741
OpenAlexW2045709781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.