ReviewJournal of biosciences2012
Application of large-scale sequencing to marker discovery in plants.
Review in Journal of biosciences, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms Related to the Resistance Against Acute Hepatopancreatic Necrosis Disease in the Pacific White ShrimpFrontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- The Challenge of Analyzing the Sugarcane Genome.Frontiers in plant science · 2018Review
- Footprints of domestication revealed by RAD-tag resequencing in loquat: SNP data reveals a non-significant domestication bottleneck and a single domestication event.BMC genomics · 2017Article
- Potential for Genetic Improvement of Sugarcane as a Source of Biomass for Biofuels.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2015Review
- Application of in silico bulked segregant analysis for rapid development of markers linked to Bean common mosaic virus resistance in common bean.BMC genomics · 2014Article
- Article
- Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in DNA sequencing provide tools for efficient large-scale discovery of markers for use in plants. Discovery options include large-scale amplicon sequencing, transcriptome sequencing, gene-enriched genome sequencing and whole genome sequencing. Examples of each of these approaches and their potential to generate molecular markers for specific applications have been described. Sequencing the whole genome of parents identifies all the polymorphisms available for analysis in their progeny. Sequencing PCR amplicons of sets of candidate genes from DNA bulks can be used to define the available variation in these genes that might be exploited in a population or germplasm collection. Sequencing of the transcriptomes of genotypes varying for the trait of interest may identify genes with patterns of expression that could explain the phenotypic variation. Sequencing genomic DNA enriched for genes by hybridization with probes for all or some of the known genes simplifies sequencing and analysis of differences in gene sequences between large numbers of genotypes and genes especially when working with complex genomes. Examples of application of the above-mentioned techniques have been described.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.