Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23106927›Full record

Trial reportAddiction (Abingdon, England)2012

Differences in the profile of neonatal abstinence syndrome signs in methadone- versus buprenorphine-exposed neonates.

Diann E Gaalema, Teresa Linares Scott, Sarah H Heil, Mara G Coyle, Karol Kaltenbach, Gary J Badger, Amelia M Arria, Susan M Stine, Peter R Martin, Hendrée E Jones

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Maintenance agonist treatments for opiate-dependent pregnant women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Prenatal Opioid Exposure and Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Diann E GaalemaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05401, USA.
Teresa Linares Scott
Sarah H Heil
Mara G Coyle
Karol Kaltenbach
Gary J Badger
Amelia M Arria
Susan M Stine
Peter R Martin
Hendrée E Jones
University of Vermont · USBrown University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USThomas Jefferson University · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · USUniversity of Vermont Medical Center · USVanderbilt University · USWayne State University · US

Funding

YOHIMBINE AS A MODEL OF ORTHOSTATIC INTOLERANCEM01RR000095 · NCRR · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MAY, JAMES M. · 1985 to 2008
$38.3M
WEIGHT MAINTENANCE AND PSYCHOLOGICAL BENEFITS OF EXERCISEM01RR000109 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT &ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI KIRKPATRICK, BETH DIANE · 1985 to 2010
$24.3M
Maternal Opioid Treatment: Human Experimental ResearchR01DA015764 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI JONES, HENDREE E · 2004 to 2008
$5.8M
Maternal Opioid Treatment: Human Experimental ResearchR01DA015738 · NIDA · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI KALTENBACH, KAROL A · 2004 to 2008
$3.6M
Maternal Opioid Treatment: Human Experimental ResearchR01DA015713 · NIDA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MARTIN, PETER ROBERT · 2004 to 2008
$2.5M
Maternal Opioid Treatment: Human Experimental ResearchR01DA015832 · NIDA · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI STINE, SUSAN M · 2004 to 2009
$2.2M
Maternal Opioid Treatment: Human Experimental ResearchR01DA018410 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT &ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI HEIL, SARAH H · 2004 to 2008
$2.2M
Maternal Opioid Treatment: Human ExperimentalR01DA018417 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA · PI FISCHER, GABRIELE · 2004 to 2008
$1.8M
Maternal Opioid Treatment: Human Experimental ResearchR01DA015778 · NIDA · WOMEN AND INFANTS HOSPITAL-RHODE ISLAND · PI LESTER, BARRY M. · 2004 to 2009
$1.6M
Maternal Opioid Treatment: Human Experimental ResearchR01DA015741 · NIDA · ST. JOSEPH'S HEALTH CENTRE · PI SELBY, PETER L · 2004 to 2008
$643k
NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000095NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000109NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR 00095NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR 109NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA015713NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA 015738NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA015738NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA 015741NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA015741NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA 015764NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA015764NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA 015778NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA015778NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA015832NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA 017513NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA 018410NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA018410NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA 018417NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA018417NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA 15832
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo compare the profile of signs of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) in methadone- versus buprenorphine-exposed infants. DESIGN, SETTING AND

participantsSecondary analysis of NAS data from a multi-site, double-blind, double-dummy, flexible-dosing, randomized clinical trial. Data from a total of 129 neonates born to opioid-dependent women who had been assigned to receive methadone or buprenorphine treatment during pregnancy were examined. MEASUREMENTS: For 10 days after delivery, neonates (methadone = 72, buprenorphine = 57) were assessed regularly using a 19-item modified Finnegan scale. Data from neonates who required pharmacological treatment (methadone = 41, buprenorphine = 27) were included up to the time treatment was initiated. The incidence and mean severity of the total NAS score and each individual sign of NAS were calculated and compared between medication conditions, as was the median time until morphine treatment initiation among treated infants in each condition.

findingsTwo NAS signs (undisturbed tremors and hyperactive Moro reflex) were observed significantly more frequently in methadone-exposed neonates and three (nasal stuffiness, sneezing, loose stools) were observed more frequently in buprenorphine-exposed neonates. Mean severity scores on the total NAS score and five individual signs (disturbed and undisturbed tremors, hyperactive Moro reflex, excessive irritability, failure to thrive) were significantly higher among methadone-exposed neonates, while sneezing was higher among buprenorphine-exposed neonates. Among treated neonates, methadone-exposed infants required treatment significantly earlier than buprenorphine-exposed infants (36 versus 59 hours postnatal, respectively).

conclusionsThe profile of neonatal abstinence syndrome differs in methadone- versus buprenorphine-exposed neonates, with significant differences in incidence, severity and treatment initiation time. Overall, methadone-exposed neonates have a more severe neonatal abstinence syndrome.

Indexed as

Prenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsAdultAnalgesics, OpioidAnalysis of VarianceBuprenorphineDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansIncidenceInfant, NewbornMethadoneNeonatal Abstinence SyndromeOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineMethadone

Identifiers

PMID23106927
PMCPMC4165073
OpenAlexW2100607375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.