Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23106822›Full record

Trial reportCancer science2013

Human umbilical vein endothelial cell vaccine therapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

Minoru Tanaka, Nelson Hirokazu Tsuno, Tomoyuki Fujii, Tomoki Todo, Nobuhito Saito, Koki Takahashi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer science, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Immunotherapy in Glioblastoma: An Overview of Current Status.Clinical pharmacology : advances and applications · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Alternative Strategies to Inhibit Tumor Vascularization.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Safety of targeting tumor endothelial cell antigens.Journal of translational medicine · 2016
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Enhanced antitumor efficacy by combination treatment with a human umbilical vein endothelial cell vaccine and a tumor cell lysate-based vaccine.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Minoru TanakaDepartment of Transfusion Medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Nelson Hirokazu Tsuno
Tomoyuki Fujii
Tomoki Todo
Nobuhito Saito
Koki Takahashi
University of Tokyo Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to assess the clinical efficacy of glutaraldehyde-fixed human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) vaccine for the treatment of patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Patients of a HUVEC vaccine group received intradermal injections of 5 × 10(7) HUVEC weekly during the first month, and every 2 weeks from the second month, until progression of the disease was observed. Salvage treatment consisted of multimodal chemotherapy, radiation, including gamma-knife therapy, and/or repeated surgery, when feasible. Hazard ratios for death were calculated using a Cox model. A total of 17 patients with recurrent glioblastoma were enrolled in this study. All the patients received the initial treatment consisting of maximal safe surgical resection, followed by radiotherapy of 50-80 Gy or more, with concomitant and adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of temozolomide or nimustine (ACNU). A total of 352 vaccinations were performed for the patients of the HUVEC vaccine group (median number of vaccination = 11 doses; range 3-122 doses). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.5 and 11.4 months, respectively. The median overall survival from the diagnosis was 24.3 months. The HUVEC vaccine therapy significantly prolonged the tumor doubling time and contributed to reducing the tumor growth rate. Hematological adverse reactions due to chemotherapy were recognized: one patient experienced grade III leukocytopenia and one showed grade II lymphocytopenia. Associated with the HUVEC vaccine therapy, a delayed-type hypersensitivity-like skin reaction developed at the injection site. The HUVEC vaccine therapy effectively controlled disease progression, without evident adverse effects, except for a delayed-type hypersensitivity-like skin reaction at the injection site.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingBrain NeoplasmsCancer VaccinesChemotherapy, AdjuvantDacarbazineDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionFemaleGlioblastomaHumansHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial CellsImmunotherapy, ActiveMaleMiddle AgedNimustineTemozolomideAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingCancer VaccinesDacarbazineNimustineTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID23106822
PMCPMC7657109
OpenAlexW2027756031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.