ReviewJournal of comparative effectiveness research2012
Role of practice-based research networks in comparative effectiveness research.
Review in Journal of comparative effectiveness research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research.Journal of general internal medicine · 2014Pooled it
- Primary care provides medication for opioid use disorder: findings from the HOMER study.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Building a national headache medicine research network: The BE WELL with Migraine Champion Providers Network™.Headache · 2026Article
- Advancing oral health through practice-based research.Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) · 2023Article
- Integration of Improvement and Implementation Science in Practice-Based Research Networks: a Longitudinal, Comparative Case Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2021Article
- Applying a Commercialization-Readiness Framework to Optimize Value for Achieving Sustainability of an Electronic Health Data Research Network and Its Data Capabilities: The SAFTINet Experience.EGEMS (Washington, DC) · 2019Article
- Factors affecting engagement between academic faculty and decision-makers: learnings and priorities for a school of public health.Health research policy and systems · 2018Article
- IMPACCT Kids' Care: a real-world example of stakeholder involvement in comparative effectiveness research.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2015Article
- Clinical Comparative Effectiveness Research Through the Lens of Healthcare Decisionmakers.Ochsner journal · 2015Review
- A national strategy to develop pragmatic clinical trials infrastructure.Clinical and translational science · 2014Article
- Characteristics and lessons learned from practice-based research networks (PBRNs) in the United States.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2012Article
- Implementation of a health data-sharing infrastructure across diverse primary care organizations.The Journal of ambulatory care managementArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Comparative effectiveness research fundamentally reorients how clinical evidence is generated and used with the goal of providing actionable information to decision-makers. To achieve this, it is vital that decision-makers and the research enterprise are engaged from research inception, to evidence generation and translation. Practice-based research networks are affiliated clinicians in diverse communities with the goal of conducting research to improve care. Practice-based research networks have the potential to advance all phases of the comparative effectiveness research cycle. The aim of this paper is to explore current and potential roles of practice-based research networks in conducting comparative effectiveness research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.