Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23105283›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB2000

Polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of tuberculosis.

M Sritharan, V Sritharan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M SritharanDepartment of Animal Sciences, School of Life Sciences, University of Hyderabad, 46 Hyderabad.
V Sritharan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A rapid, sensitive, specific and yet economical method for the diagnosis ofM. tuberculosis and other mycobacteria in clinical specimen is a desperate and urgent requirement of the day in the laboratory diagnosis and hence management of tuberculosis. This need is further accentuated by emerging diseases like multi drug resistant tuberculosis, tuberculosis in AIDS patients and opportunistic mycobacterial infections, which do not respond to conventional anti TB therapy. Molecular methods, particularly PCR based detection ofM. tuberculosis, has come a long way since it was first described about fifteen years ago. Several probes have been developed and some of them, particularly the IS6110 and TB400 have been validated on several clinical samples. The latter has been validated on a variety of clinical specimens along with a simple sample processing method. Polymerase chain reaction based diagnosis ofM. tuberculosis has been introduced as one of the routine/confirmatory tests in clinical microbiology laboratory in some countries like Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom several years ago. The possibility of introducing PCR based direct diagnosis of drug resistance is being explored in some laboratories, particularly for drugs like rifampicin. The evolution and application of PCR for diagnosis ofM. tuberculosis is being analysed and discussed in this review.

Indexed as

DNA probesPolymerase chain reactiontuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID23105283
PMCPMC3454082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.