Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23105014›Full record

ArticleGenetics2013

Large neurological component to genetic differences underlying biased sperm use in Drosophila.

Clement Y Chow, Mariana F Wolfner, Andrew G Clark

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Female genetic variation controlling timing of mating plug ejection inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. microPublication biology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. AeLife · 2020
    Article
  11. ThePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  12. TheG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020
    Article
  13. Structural variation inRoyal Society open science · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The road less traveled: from genotype to phenotype in flies and humans.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Clement Y ChowDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-2703, USA. cyc8@cornell.edu
Mariana F Wolfner
Andrew G Clark
Cornell University · US

Funding

TAKASHIMA DIVERSITY SUPPLEMENT TO: REGULATION OF GAMETE USE AND NEURAL PATHWAYS IN REPRODUCTIONR01HD059060 · NICHD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI ANDREW G CLARK, Mariana Federica Wolfner · 2009 to 2026
$5.8M
Reproductive Sciences and Genomics Training ProgramT32HD052471 · NICHD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI ROBERSON, MARK S · 2007 to 2016
$2.0M
Genetic Analysis of Male x Female Interaction in Drosophila Sperm CompetitionF32GM093663 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI CHOW, CLEMENT · 2010 to 2011
$98k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD059060NICHD NIH HHS R01-HD059060NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD052471NICHD NIH HHS T32-HD052471NIGMS NIH HHS 1F32GM093663-01NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM093663
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sperm competition arises as a result of complex interactions among male and female factors. While the roles of some male factors are known, little is known of the molecules or mechanisms that underlie the female contribution to sperm competition. The genetic tools available for Drosophila allow us to identify, in an unbiased manner, candidate female genes that are critical for mediating sperm competition outcomes. We first screened for differences in female sperm storage and use patterns by characterizing the natural variation in sperm competition in a set of 39 lines from the sequenced Drosophila Genetic Reference Panel (DGRP) of wild-derived inbred lines. We found extensive female variation in sperm competition outcomes. To generate a list of candidate female genes for functional studies, we performed a genome-wide association mapping, utilizing the common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) segregating in the DGRP lines. Surprisingly, SNPs within ion channel genes and other genes with roles in the nervous system were among the top associated SNPs. Knockdown studies of three candidate genes (para, Rab2, and Rim) in sensory neurons innervating the female reproductive tract indicate that some of these candidate female genes may affect sperm competition by modulating the neural input of these sensory neurons to the female reproductive tract. More extensive functional studies are needed to elucidate the exact role of all these candidate female genes in sperm competition. Nevertheless, the female nervous system appears to have a previously unappreciated role in sperm competition. Our results indicate that the study of female control of sperm competition should not be limited to female reproductive tract-specific genes, but should focus also on diverse biological pathways.

Indexed as

ReproductionAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsFemaleGene ExpressionMaleNervous SystemPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRNA InterferenceSexual Behavior, AnimalSpermatozoaDrosophila Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23105014
PMCPMC3527244
OpenAlexW2125392438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.