Trial reportClinical trials (London, England)2013
Conducting the ACTIVE randomized trial in hospice care: keys to success.
Trial report in Clinical trials (London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01211340 (The ACTIVE Intervention to Improve Hospice Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The ACTIVE Intervention to Improve Hospice Care
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Models for delivery and co-ordination of primary or secondary health care (or both) to older adults living in aged care facilities.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Caregiver speaks: a randomized controlled trial of a storytelling intervention for hospice family caregivers of persons with dementia.The Gerontologist · 2026Trial
- Hospice Family Caregiver Involvement in Care Plan Meetings: A Mixed-Methods Randomized Controlled Trial.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2017Trial
- The Social Convoy for Family Caregivers Over the Course of Hospice.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2016Trial
- Exploring the collective hospice caregiving experience.Journal of palliative medicine · 2014Trial
- Exploring oral literacy in communication with hospice caregivers.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2013Trial
- Using medical words with family caregivers.Journal of palliative medicine · 2013Trial
- Pain Management Education for Rural Hospice Family Caregivers: A Pilot Study With Embedded Implementation Evaluation.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2024Article
- Health, social care and technological interventions to improve functional ability of older adults living at home: An evidence and gap map.Campbell systematic reviews · 2021Article
- Caregiver Speaks Study Protocol: A Technologically-Mediated Storytelling Intervention for Hospice Family Caregivers of Persons Living With Dementia.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2021Article
- Challenges in Implementing Hospice Clinical Trials: Preserving Scientific Integrity While Facing Change.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2020Article
- Palliative and end-of-life care research in Scotland 2006-2015: a systematic scoping review.BMC palliative care · 2018Article
- A Qualitative Analysis of Information Sharing in Hospice Interdisciplinary Group Meetings.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2017Article
- A multimethod analysis of shared decision-making in hospice interdisciplinary team meetings including family caregivers.Palliative medicine · 2016Article
- Hospice family members' perceptions of and experiences with end-of-life care in the nursing home.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2014Article
- Testing the factorial validity of scores from the caregiver pain medicine questionnaire.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2014Article
- Caregiver evaluation of the ACTIVE intervention: "it was like we were sitting at the table with everyone".The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2014Article
- Implementation science: implications for intervention research in hospice and palliative care.The Gerontologist · 2014Review
- Patient safety incidents in hospice care: observations from interdisciplinary case conferences.Journal of palliative medicine · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUntreated pain is common for patients at the end of life. Informal caregivers, often family or friends of patients, are responsible for working with hospice staff to provide pain management. Interdisciplinary team meetings conducted in hospices every 2 weeks provide an opportunity for hospice staff to communicate about pain management with informal caregivers of hospice patients. PURPOSE: We present challenges, solutions, and keys strategies for carrying out a randomized trial in the hospice setting.
methodsWe are conducting the Assessing Caregivers for Team Intervention through Video Encounters (ACTIVE) study to determine whether regular videoconferencing between hospice patients' informal caregivers and the hospice care team alters caregivers' perceptions of pain management and patients' pain. Participants must be primary caregivers for a hospice patient, at least 18 years of age, capable of providing informed consent, and have access to a computer with a high-speed Internet connection or a telephone. We randomized caregivers to participate in biweekly team meetings through video or phone conferencing (intervention) or to receive usual care from the hospice. All patients receive standard hospice care regardless of the group assignment of their informal caregiver.
resultsAs of 1 July 2012, there have been 1038 new admissions to the participating hospices. Of 391 cases in which no contact was made, 233 patients had died or had life expectancy less than 14 days. Home visits were made to 271 interested and eligible caregivers; 249 caregivers of 233 patients were randomly assigned to the usual care or intervention arm. Enrollment is on pace to meet recruitment goals. Lessons Learned Thorough pilot testing of instruments and procedures helped us overcome barriers to conducting research in this vulnerable population. Keys to success included obtaining support from hospice medical directors, including hospice staff in study preparation, minimizing the burden on hospice staff, housing research staff in each participating hospice, using newsletters to enhance communication, developing and maintaining a detailed procedural manual, producing regular data quality reports, developing a secure site to facilitate coding videos for qualitative studies, and holding regular teleconferences with key staff. LIMITATIONS: Late enrollment of many patients in hospice left little to no time for their caregivers to take part in the intervention. Assisting caregivers of patients with very short life expectancy may require different methods.
conclusionsThe challenges of conducting randomized trials with hospice patients and caregivers can be addressed with appropriate study design, well-tested research methods, and proactive monitoring of any issues or problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.