Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23104521›Full record

ReviewStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2012

When are breast cancer patients old enough for the quitclaim of local control?

M L Sautter-Bihl, F Sedlmayer, W Budach, J Dunst, P Feyer, R Fietkau, W Haase, W Harms, C Rödel, R Souchon and 2 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. DEGRO practical guidelines for radiotherapy of breast cancer VI: therapy of locoregional breast cancer recurrences.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2016
    Guideline
  2. DEGRO practical guidelines for radiotherapy of breast cancer IV: radiotherapy following mastectomy for invasive breast cancer.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2014
    Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. From heart to heart for breast cancer patients - cardiovascular toxicities in breast cancer radiotherapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2014
    Article
  8. Conformal breast irradiation with the arm of the affected side parallel to the body.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2014
    Article
  9. Radiation oncologists' view on the zurich consensus.Breast care (Basel, Switzerland) · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 11 institutions in 4 countries.

M L Sautter-BihlKlinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Moltkestr. 90, 76133, Karlsruhe, Germany. marie-luise.sautter-bihl@klinikum-karlsruhe.de
F Sedlmayer
W Budach
J Dunst
P Feyer
R Fietkau
W Haase
W Harms
C Rödel
R Souchon
F Wenz
R Sauer
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEParacelsus Medical University · ATStädtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe · DESt Clara Hospital · NLSt. Vincentius-Kliniken · DEUniversitätsklinikum Tulln · ATUniversity Children's Hospital Tübingen · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough postoperative radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) halves the 10-year recurrence rate in breast cancer patients through all age groups, the question of whether RT may be omitted and replaced by endocrine therapy for women aged 70 years and older with low-risk factors has recently become an issue of debate.

methodsSurvey of the relevant recent literature (Medline) and international guidelines.

resultsThree randomized studies investigating the effect of RT in older women revealed significantly increased local recurrence rates when RT was omitted, and a negative impact on disease-free survival was observed in two of these trials. Despite these findings, in one of the studies omission of RT in women over 70 is recommended, leading to a respective amendment in the guidelines of the American National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Several large retrospective cohort studies analyzing the outcome of patients over 65 years with and without RT have since been published and showed a significantly improved local control in all subgroups of advanced age and stage, which predominantly translated into improved disease-free and overall survival.

conclusionNo subgroup of elderly patients has yet been identified that did not profit from RT in terms of local control. Therefore, chronological age alone is not an appropriate criterion for deciding against or in favor of adjuvant RT. The DEGRO breast cancer expert panel explicitly discourages determination of a certain age for the omission of postoperative RT in healthy elderly women with low-risk breast cancer. For frail elderly women, treatment decisions should be individually decided on the basis of standardized geriatric assessment.

Indexed as

AgedAge FactorsAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMastectomy, SegmentalNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPractice Guidelines as TopicRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic Agents, Hormonal

Identifiers

PMID23104521
OpenAlexW125588895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.