Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23104514›Full record

SynthesisEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2013

Surgery versus conservative care for neck pain: a systematic review.

Marienke van Middelkoop, Sidney M Rubinstein, Raymond Ostelo, Maurits W van Tulder, Wilco Peul, Bart W Koes, Arianne P Verhagen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06663592 (Effectiveness of Slider and Tensioner Neurodynamic Mobilization Techniques in Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06663592 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of Slider and Tensioner Neurodynamic Mobilization Techniques in Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled36ConditionsCervical Radiculopathy, Neuromobılızatıon, Median Nerve, ElectromyographyArmsConventional treatment, Tensioner Neuro Dynamic Mobilization, Slider Neuro Dynamic Mobilization
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. What is success of treatment? Expected outcome scores in cervical radiculopathy patients were much higher than the previously reported cut-off values for success.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Acupotomy Therapy for Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Neck pain with radiculopathy.BMJ clinical evidence · 2015
    Article
  19. The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland Yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2013.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Marienke van MiddelkoopDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO BOX 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sidney M Rubinstein
Raymond Ostelo
Maurits W van Tulder
Wilco Peul
Bart W Koes
Arianne P Verhagen
Erasmus MC · NLEMGO Institute for Health and Care Research · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity Hospital and Clinics · USUniversity Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveGeneral practitioners refer patients with continued neck pain that do not respond well to conservative care frequently to secondary care for further assessment. Are surgical interventions to the cervical spine effective when compared to conservative care for patients with neck pain?

designSystematic review.

methodThe search strategy outlined by the Cochrane Back Review Group (CBRG) was followed. The primary search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and PEDro up to June 2011. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) of adults with neck pain, which evaluated at least one clinically relevant primary outcome measure (e.g. pain, functional status, recovery), were included. In addition, treatments had to include surgery and conservative care. Two authors independently assessed risk of bias using the criteria recommended by the CBRG and extracted the data. The quality of the evidence was rated using the GRADE method.

resultsPatients included had neck pain with or without radiculopathy or myelopathy. In total, three RCTs and six CCTs were identified comparing different surgical interventions with conservative care, of which one had a low risk of bias. Overall there is very low quality of evidence available on the effectiveness of surgery compared to conservative care in neck pain patients showing overall no differences.

conclusionMost studies on surgical techniques comparing these to conservative care showed a high risk of bias. The benefit of surgery over conservative care is not clearly demonstrated.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeHumansNeck PainOrthopedic Procedures

Identifiers

PMID23104514
PMCPMC3540296
OpenAlexW2014798378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.