Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23104264›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2013

The uncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonists ketamine and memantine preferentially increase the choice for a small, immediate reward in low-impulsive rats.

Pietro Cottone, Attilio Iemolo, Aditi R Narayan, Jina Kwak, Duncan Momaney, Valentina Sabino

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Striatal functional connectivity in chronic ketamine users: a pilot study.The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pietro CottoneDepartment of Pharmacology, Laboratory of Addictive Disorders, Boston University School of Medicine, 72 E Concord St., R-618, Boston, MA 02118, USA. cottone@bu.edu
Attilio Iemolo
Aditi R Narayan
Jina Kwak
Duncan Momaney
Valentina Sabino
Boston University · US

Funding

Role of Neuropeptides in AnxietyR01MH093650 · NIMH · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI SABINO, VALENTINA · 2012 to 2016
$2.0M
Role of the Endocannabinoid System in Compulsive EatingR01MH091945 · NIMH · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI COTTONE, PIETRO · 2010 to 2014
$2.0M
Neurobiology of compulsive eating.R01DA030425 · NIDA · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI COTTONE, PIETRO · 2011 to 2015
$1.6M
The dark side of preferred food addiction: role of CRF systemsR00DA023680 · NIDA · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI COTTONE, PIETRO · 2009 to 2011
$735k
Role of sigma receptors in ethanol reinforcementR00AA016731 · NIAAA · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI SABINO, VALENTINA · 2009 to 2011
$732k
The dark side of preferred food addiction: role of CRF systemsK99DA023680 · NIDA · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI COTTONE, PIETRO · 2007 to 2008
$179k
Role of sigma receptors in ethanol reinforcementK99AA016731 · NIAAA · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI SABINO, VALENTINA · 2007 to 2008
$153k
NIAAA NIH HHS AA016731NIAAA NIH HHS K99 AA016731NIAAA NIH HHS R00 AA016731NIDA NIH HHS DA023680NIDA NIH HHS DA030425NIDA NIH HHS K99 DA023680NIDA NIH HHS R00 DA023680NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA030425NIMH NIH HHS MH091945NIMH NIH HHS MH093650A1NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH091945NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH093650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleImpulsive behavior is categorically differentiated between impulsive action, the inability to withhold from acting out a response, and impulsive choice, the greater preference for an immediate and smaller reward over a delayed but more advantageous reward. While the effects of N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor antagonists on impulsive action have been extensively characterized, there are very few and conflicting reports on the effects of this class of drugs on impulsive choice.

objectivesUsing a modified adjusting delay task, we investigated the effects of uncompetitive and competitive blockade of NMDA receptors on impulsive choice.

methodsMale Wistar rats were trained in a modified adjusting delay task, which involved repeated choice between a low reinforcing solution delivered immediately and a highly reinforcing solution delivered after a variable delay. Rats were then administered either the NMDA receptor uncompetitive antagonists ketamine or memantine, or the competitive antagonists D-AP-5 or CGS 19755.

resultsKetamine treatment dose-dependently increased impulsive choice, and this effect was selective for low-impulsive but not high-impulsive rats. Similarly, memantine treatment dose-dependently increased impulsive choice with a preferential effect for low-impulsive rats. While D-AP-5 treatment did not affect impulsive choice, CGS 19755 increased impulsivity, however, at the same doses at which it caused a marked response inhibition.

conclusionsNMDA receptor uncompetitive, but not competitive, antagonists significantly increased impulsive choice, preferentially in low-impulsive rats. These findings demonstrate that the effects of NMDA receptor blockade on impulsive choice are not generalizable and depend on the specific mechanism of action of the antagonist used.

Indexed as

Reinforcement ScheduleRewardAnimalsBehavior, AnimalChoice BehaviorConditioning, OperantImpulsive BehaviorKetamineMaleMemantineRatsRats, WistarReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateKetamineMemantineReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

PMID23104264
PMCPMC3572289
OpenAlexW2087793845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.