Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23103452›Full record

Trial reportJournal of aging and health2013

Memory training in the ACTIVE study: how much is needed and who benefits?

George W Rebok, Jessica B S Langbaum, Richard N Jones, Alden L Gross, Jeanine M Parisi, Adam P Spira, Alexandra M Kueider, Hanno Petras, Jason Brandt

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of aging and health, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Memory training plus yoga for older adults.The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses · 2015
    Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

George W RebokJohns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jessica B S Langbaum
Richard N Jones
Alden L Gross
Jeanine M Parisi
Adam P Spira
Alexandra M Kueider
Hanno Petras
Jason Brandt

Funding

Translational Researchin Aging Trainnig ProgramT32AG023480 · NIA · HEBREW REHABILITATION CENTER FOR AGED · PI LIPSITZ, LEWIS · 2004 to 2024
$7.6M
Research Training in Age-Related Cognitive DisordersT32AG027668 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MARILYN S. ALBERT · 2007 to 2026
$6.3M
TRIAL OF A COGNITIVE INTERVENTION FOR OLDER ADULTSU01AG014260 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI REBOK, GEORGE W. · 1996 to 2010
$3.4M
COGNITIVE APPROACH TO MAINTAINING SELF CARE INVOLVEMENTU01NR004507 · NINR · HEBREW REHABILITATION CENTER FOR AGED · PI MORRIS, JOHN N. · 1996 to 2010
$3.1M
TRIAL OF A COGNITIVE INTERVENTION FOR OLDER ADULTS--CCU01AG014282 · NIA · NEW ENGLAND RESEARCH INSTITUTES, INC. · PI TENNSTEDT, SHARON L · 1996 to 2010
$3.0M
MAINTENANCE AND ENHANCEMENT OF COGNITIVE ADLSU01NR004508 · NINR · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI UNVERZAGT, FREDERICK W. · 1996 to 2010
$2.8M
FLUID REASONING TRAINING FOR URBAN ELDERSU01AG014276 · NIA · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MARSISKE, MICHAEL · 1996 to 2010
$2.7M
FLUID ABILITY TRAINING AMONG ELDERLYU01AG014263 · NIA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI WILLIS, SHERRY L · 1996 to 2010
$2.3M
COGNITIVE TRAINING &EVERYDAY COMPETENCE IN THE ELDERLYU01AG014289 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI BALL, KARLENE K · 1996 to 2010
$2.3M
NIA NIH HHS T32 AG023480NIA NIH HHS T32 AG027668NIA NIH HHS U01 AG014260NIA NIH HHS U01 AG014263NIA NIH HHS U01 AG014276NIA NIH HHS U01 AG014282NIA NIH HHS U01 AG014289NIA NIH HHS U01AG14260NIA NIH HHS U01AG14263NIA NIH HHS U01AG14276NIA NIH HHS U01AG14282NIA NIH HHS U01AG14289NINR NIH HHS U01 NR004507NINR NIH HHS U01 NR004508NINR NIH HHS U01NR04507NINR NIH HHS U01NR04508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OBJECTIVE AND

methodData from the memory training arm (n = 629) of the Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly (ACTIVE) trial were examined to characterize change in memory performance through 5 years of follow-up as a function of memory training, booster training, adherence to training, and other characteristics.

resultsLatent growth model analyses revealed that memory training was associated with improved memory performance through Year 5 but that neither booster training nor training adherence significantly influenced this effect. Baseline age was associated with change in memory performance attributable to the passage of time alone (i.e., to aging). Higher education and better self-rated health were associated with greater change in memory performance after training. DISCUSSION: These findings confirm that memory training can aid in maintaining long-term improvements in memory performance. Booster training and adherence to training do not appear to attenuate rates of normal age-related memory decline.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyNeeds AssessmentAgedAgingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMemoryTreatment OutcomeACTIVE trialagingcognitive trainingmemory declinememory trainingtraining adherence

Identifiers

PMID23103452
PMCPMC3825774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.