Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23102637›Full record

ArticleSurgery2013

Variation in susceptibility of human malignant melanomas to oncolytic vesicular stomatitis virus.

Aaron U Blackham, Scott A Northrup, Mark Willingham, Ralph B D'Agostino, Douglas S Lyles, John H Stewart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Activation and Evasion of the FEAR Pathway by RNA Viruses.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aaron U BlackhamDepartment of General Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
Scott A Northrup
Mark Willingham
Ralph B D'Agostino
Douglas S Lyles
John H Stewart
Wake Forest University · US

Funding

Tumor Tissue CoreP30CA012197 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Ruben A. Mesa · 1985 to 2026
$55.4M
CELLULAR INTERACTIONS OF VIRAL MATRIX PROTEINR01AI032983 · NIAID · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LYLES, DOUGLAS S. · 1994 to 2013
$3.3M
Oncolytic Vesicular Stomatitis Virus for the Treatment of Colorectal CancerK08CA131482 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI STEWART, JOHN H · 2008 to 2012
$732k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA131482NCI NIH HHS K08-CA131482NCI NIH HHS P30 CA012197NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI032983NIAID NIH HHS R01-AI32983PHS HHS 63527
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) is a novel, anti-cancer therapy that targets cancer cells selectively with defective antiviral responses; however, not all malignant cells are sensitive to the oncolytic effects of VSV. Herein, we have explored the mechanistic determinants of mutant M protein VSV (M51R-VSV) susceptibility in malignant melanoma cells.

methodsCell viability after VSV infection was measured by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium (MTS) viability assay in a panel of melanoma cell lines. VSV infectability, viral protein synthesis, and viral progeny production were quantified by flow cytometry, (35)S-methionine electrophoresis, and viral plaque assays, respectively. Interferon (IFN) responsiveness was determined using MTS assay after β-IFN pretreatment. Xenografts were established in athymic nude mice and treated with intratumoral M51R-VSV.

resultsCell viability after M51R-VSV infection at a multiplicity of infection of 10 pfu/mL, 48 hours postinfection) ranged between 0 ± 1% and 59 ± 9% (mean ± standard deviation). Sensitive cell lines supported VSV infection, viral protein synthesis, and viral progeny production. In addition, when pretreated with β-IFN, sensitive cells became resistant to M51R-VSV, suggesting that IFN-mediated antiviral signaling is defective in these cells. In contrast, resistant melanoma cells do not support VSV infection, viral protein synthesis, or viral replication, indicating that antiviral defenses remain intact. In a murine xenograft model, intratumoral M51R-VSV treatment decreased tumor growth relative to controls after 26 days in SK-Mel 5 (-21 ± 19% vs. 2,100 ± 770%; P < .0001) and in SK-Mel 3 (2,000 ± 810% vs. 7,000 ± 3,000%; P = .008) established tumors.

conclusionM51R-VSV is a viable anti-cancer therapy, but susceptibility varies among melanomas. Future work will exploit specific mechanisms of resistance to expand the therapeutic efficacy of M51R-VSV.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalHumansInterferon-betaMelanomaMiceMice, NudeMutationOncolytic VirotherapyVesicular stomatitis Indiana virusViral Matrix ProteinsViral ProteinsVirus ReplicationXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysInterferon-betaM protein, Vesicular stomatitis virusViral Matrix ProteinsViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23102637
PMCPMC3561511
OpenAlexW2060632162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.