Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23102490›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in biotechnology2013

In situ treatment of PCBs by anaerobic microbial dechlorination in aquatic sediment: are we there yet?

Kevin R Sowers, Harold D May

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in biotechnology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Microbial and enzymatic degradation of PCBs from e-waste-contaminated sites: a review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genomic characterization of three unique Dehalococcoides that respire on persistent polychlorinated biphenyls.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kevin R SowersDepartment of Marine Biotechnology, University of Maryland Baltimore County and Institute of Marine & Environmental Technology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Harold D May

Funding

Integrating microbial biostimulation and electrolytic aeration to degrade POPsR01ES016197 · NIEHS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI MAY, HAROLD D · 2008 to 2010
$1.2M
NIEHS NIH HHS 5R01ES-016197-02NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES016197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The remediation of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in soils and sediments remains a particularly difficult problem to solve. The possibility of in situ degradation by microorganisms has been pursued for many years since this approach has the potential to provide a cost-effective and environmentally sustainable alternative to dredging for treatment of PCB impacted sites. Being hydrophobic, PCBs partition into organic material and accumulate in anoxic environments well poised to support anaerobic dechlorination of highly chlorinated congeners; products of which are susceptible to complete aerobic degradation. Laboratory research over the past 25 years is now leading to new microbial technologies that could soon be tested for treatment of PCB impacted sediments in the field.

Indexed as

HalogenationAnaerobiosisBacteriaBiodegradation, EnvironmentalGeologic SedimentsPolychlorinated BiphenylsSoil PollutantsPolychlorinated BiphenylsSoil Pollutants

Identifiers

PMID23102490
PMCPMC3572274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.