Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23101672›Full record

ReviewThe Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice2012

Gross lesions of alimentary disease in adult cattle.

Bradley L Njaa, Roger J Panciera, Edward G Clark, Catherine G Lamm

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bradley L NjaaDepartment of Pathobiology, Center for Veterinary Health Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74074-2007, USA. brad.njaa@okstate.edu
Roger J Panciera
Edward G Clark
Catherine G Lamm

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of the gross necropsy examination of the gastrointestinal tract is to recognize the presence of lesions, thus requiring a basic understanding of its normal appearance and anatomy. This article highlights gross changes to the gastrointestinal tract of adult cattle that help place the disease processes into broad categories. Although few gross lesions reach the zenith of pathognomonic, there are numerous lesions that, when considered in aggregate with history (eg, number of animals affected, environment, duration of signs, time of onset relative to management changes, previous management) and clinical signs, can help narrow the spectrum of causes, provide a basis for a strong presumptive diagnosis, and focus diagnostic test selection.

Indexed as

AnimalsAutopsyCattleCattle DiseasesDiagnosis, DifferentialGastrointestinal DiseasesGastrointestinal Tract

Identifiers

PMID23101672
PMCPMC7125524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.