Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23100701›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of microbiology2008

The enzymatic basis for pesticide bioremediation.

Colin Scott, Gunjan Pandey, Carol J Hartley, Colin J Jackson, Matthew J Cheesman, Matthew C Taylor, Rinku Pandey, Jeevan L Khurana, Mark Teese, Chris W Coppin and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of microbiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Recent Advances in Enzymes for the Bioremediation of Pollutants.Biochemistry research international · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Colin ScottCSIRO Entomology, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601 Australia.
Gunjan Pandey
Carol J Hartley
Colin J Jackson
Matthew J Cheesman
Matthew C Taylor
Rinku Pandey
Jeevan L Khurana
Mark Teese
Chris W Coppin
Kahli M Weir
Rakesh K Jain
Rup Lal
Robyn J Russell
John G Oakeshott

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enzymes are central to the biology of many pesticides, influencing their modes of action, environmental fates and mechanisms of target species resistance. Since the introduction of synthetic xenobiotic pesticides, enzymes responsible for pesticide turnover have evolved rapidly, in both the target organisms and incidentally exposed biota. Such enzymes are a source of significant biotechnological potential and form the basis of several bioremediation strategies intended to reduce the environmental impacts of pesticide residues. This review describes examples of enzymes possessing the major activities employed in the bioremediation of pesticide residues, and some of the strategies by which they are employed. In addition, several examples of specific achievements in enzyme engineering are considered, highlighting the growing trend in tailoring enzymatic activity to a specific biotechnologically relevant function.

Indexed as

Bacterial enzymesBioremediationPesticidesXenobiotics

Identifiers

PMID23100701
PMCPMC3450202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.